admin
Fri, 10/14/2022 - 16:47
Edited Text
Stephen
McHale
Master
of
Music
Candidate,
Contemporary
Performance,
Berklee
College
of
Music
–
Valencia
Campus
Culminating
Experience
Final
Paper
Soundcloud
Playlist
for
Musical
Examples
–
https://soundcloud.com/mchalestephen/sets/ce-‐soundcloud
1
–
INTRODUCTION
1.1
–
Musical
Beginnings
My
name
is
Stephen
McHale,
I
am
a
guitarist
and
composer
from
Ireland.
I
have
previously
studied
for
a
National
Diploma
in
Popular
Music
at
Ballyfermot
College
of
Further
Education,
receiving
a
Distinction
grade,
as
well
as
a
Bachelor
of
Arts
in
Jazz
Performance
from
Newpark
Music
Centre,
where
I
graduated
with
First
Class
Honours.
Despite
having
spent
four
years
studying
for
a
degree
in
Jazz
Performance,
and
therefore
having
the
bulk
of
my
practice
and
learning
time
for
many
years
devoted
to
jazz,
I
still
feel
a
disconnect
from
jazz
music
as
it
was
something
I
came
to
later
in
my
development
as
a
musician.
The
sounds
that
initially
piqued
my
musical
interests
are
the
contemporary
music
of
my
younger
years,
as
well
as
the
older
rock
and
pop
music
that
was
played
in
my
house
growing
up.
The
explosion
of
Britpop
when
I
was
very
young
was
the
starting
point
for
the
development
of
my
interest
in
music,
as
I
obsessively
listened
to
the
bands
of
the
time,
Oasis,
Blur,
Pulp,
The
Stone
Roses,
and
then
sought
out
all
the
influences
they
spoke
of
in
interviews,
Led
Zeppelin,
The
Beatles,
Jimi
Hendrix,
etc.
This
process
of
searching
through
older
recordings
continued
and
eventually
led
me
to
the
jazz
fusion
styles
of
The
Mahavishnu
Orchestra,
Jeff
Beck,
Weather
Report,
Jaco
Pastorius,
etc.
It
wasn’t
until
I
began
my
Bachelor
in
Jazz
Performance
that
I
really
began
to
listen
to
the
older
jazz
masters,
Miles
Davis,
Wes
Montgomery,
Thelonious
Monk,
Wayne
Shorter.
The
result
of
growing
up
in
an
environment
where
music
was
ubiquitous,
as
many
members
of
my
family
work
in
the
Irish
music
industry,
as
well
as
having
studied
music
in
the
popular
and
jazz
idioms,
coupled
with
the
fact
I
have
a
personal
interest
in
a
very
broad
range
of
musical
styles,
has
meant
that
I
have
found
myself
working
professionally
as
a
sideman
in
a
broad
variety
of
genres,
having
to
be
competent,
knowledgeable,
and
comfortable
in
all
of
these
scenarios.
1.2
–
Focused
Eclecticism
Since
arriving
in
Valencia,
I
have
fully
realised
the
benefit
of
these
experiences,
as
it
has
meant
I
have
been
able
to
continue
broadening
my
musical
horizons
while
also
delighting
in
the
fact
that
I
can
partake
in
a
huge
volume
of
performances/recordings
with
a
varied
collection
of
my
classmates
and
professors.
The
continuous
flow
of
visiting
artists
to
Berklee
Valencia
has
also
been
enlightening
in
terms
of
this
project,
the
knowledge
that
versatility
creates
more
opportunities
for
me
to
play
with,
and
as
a
consequence,
learn
from,
the
visiting
artists
drives
me
to
work
harder
at
ensuring
I
can
fit
into
as
many
musical
scenarios
as
possible.
Of
course
this
approach
will
have
the
knock-‐on
effect
of
developing
my
professional
skills
with
a
view
to
a
successful
life
as
a
musician
once
my
time
at
Berklee
Valencia
has
ended.
While
I
have
benefitted
from
and
enjoyed
these
opportunities
enormously,
I
have
also
come
to
realise
the
importance
of
performing
and
recording
my
own
compositions,
in
terms
of
finding
my
own
voice
as
an
instrumentalist,
the
continuation
of
the
development
of
my
own
particular
style,
as
well
as
maintaining
a
working
life
as
an
original
artist,
so
that
I
may
enjoy
the
benefits
of
being
in
a
position
to
perform
the
music
of
other
people,
as
well
as
working
on
my
own
material,
while
being
musically
challenged
in
a
varied
enough
fashion
that
I
don’t
grow
jaded
with
either.
2
–
PROJECT
2.1
-‐
Project
In
this
sense,
there
is
a
conflict
between
the
music
that
I
first
loved
and
the
music
I
study.
This
is
a
common
theme
among
contemporary
jazz
musicians,
as
unlike
the
masters
of
the
genre
which
we
study,
i.e.,
Charlie
Parker,
John
Coltrane,
Herbie
Hancock,
etc.,
most
of
us
did
not
grow
up
with
jazz
music
as
a
regular
fixture
in
our
lives,
it
was
something
we
were
exposed
to
after
years
spent
learning
to
play
the
music
that
surrounded
us
in
our
early
years,
be
it
rock,
pop,
funk,
hip-‐hop,
blues,
and
so
on.
My
intention
for
this
project
is
to
compose,
record,
and
release
an
EP
of
original
compositions
that
combine
my
initial
musical
influences
with
the
music
I
have
been
studying
both
as
a
student
at
Berklee
Valencia
and
at
my
previous
educational
institutes.
This
will
be
combined
with
a
written
document
to
analyse
and
justify
the
reasons
for
working
towards
this
goal,
also
containing
an
analysis
of
the
compositions
themselves.
2.2
–
Compositonal
Process
The
compositional
process
I
employed
in
the
writing
of
the
material
for
this
EP
varied
slightly
from
piece
to
piece,
and
the
method
shall
be
gone
into
in
more
depth
later
in
this
document,
but
the
general
system
remained
the
same
each
time.
I
would
specifically
set
aside
a
time
slot
several
days
in
advance
of
when
I
planned
to
compose,
this
would
mean
that
I
would
have
time
to
think
about
what
my
intention
was
going
to
be
for
the
piece,
I
could
listen
to
music
and
consider
whether
or
not
there
would
be
a
particular
piece
of
music,
or
many
different
pieces,
that
were
going
to
influence
this
composition.
I
would
also
make
short
recordings
of
any
ideas
that
came
to
me
in
the
days
leading
up
to
my
composition
time.
This
mental
and
musical
preparation
with
composition
in
mind
meant
that
I
never
had
to
approach
a
blank
page
and
begin
to
write
without
any
direction
or
guidance,
it
made
the
process
quicker
and
helped
me
hit
the
ground
running
each
time.
Once
I
had
composed
all
the
parts
for
the
members
of
the
band
and
entered
them
to
Finale,
I
would
organise
a
rehearsal
and
play
what
I
had
written
with
the
musicians
in
my
group.
Invariably,
the
first
playing
of
the
piece
would
bring
issues
to
my
attention,
especially
in
terms
of
the
length
of
sections,
orchestration,
and
dynamics.
I
would
decide
on
these
changes
in
the
rehearsal,
make
the
adjustments
to
the
musicians’
parts,
and
then
hope
that
by
the
end
I
would
have
an
arrangement
that
was
effective.
After
making
a
recording
of
this
arrangement,
using
either
my
iPhone
or
MBox,
I
would
bring
the
recording
to
Perico
Sambeat
during
his
scheduled
office
hours,
play
the
composition
for
him
and
ask
for
his
opinion
on
all
aspects
of
the
piece.
Perico
is
a
compositional
master,
particularly
of
the
contemporary
jazz
genre,
and
his
observations
and
comments
were
invaluable
in
terms
of
working
to
ensure
the
composition
be
of
the
highest
quality
possible.
I
would
take
notes
at
these
sessions
and
then,
if
necessary,
make
changes
to
the
arrangement
and
send
the
finished
parts
to
the
musicians
before
what
would
usually
be
a
second
rehearsal,
but
occasionally,
due
to
time
constraints
and
lack
of
availability,
would
be
a
recording
session.
Due
to
the
fact
that
many
of
my
compositions
take
their
roots
from
a
wide
variety
of
musical
influences,
the
harmony
employed
could
occasionally
be
an
extreme
departure
from
the
style
of
chordal
progressions
I
am
familiar
with
soloing
over.
For
this
reason
I
would
use
my
private
lesson
with
Israel
Sandoval
to
ask
for
advice
on
how
to
approach
soloing
over
the
more
unusual
chords
and
chord
changes.
This
led
to
an
accumulation
of
knowledge
regarding
artificial
scales,
and
soloing
with
an
approach
that
incorporated
some
elements
of
traditional
jazz
(bebop
scales
etc.),
as
well
as
the
more
unusual
sounds
and
theory
of
the
artificially
constructed
scales,
limited
transposition
scales,
etc.
This
information
helped
me
hugely
as
it
provided
me
with
a
new
arsenal
of
sounds
in
my
improvisational
repertoire,
as
well
as
helping
me
to
be
comfortable
when
asked
to
solo
over
more
complex
harmony.
2.3
–
Compositional
Aspirations
The
aspirations
I
have
in
terms
of
these
compositions
are
to
maintain
the
listenability
and
occasionally
simplistic
melodicism
of
contemporary
popular
music,
while
also
incorporating
the
improvisational
jazz
elements
that
provide
an
opportunity
for
me
to
showcase
the
skills
I
have
been
working
on
for
the
past
number
of
years,
and
particularly
the
skills
I
have
learned
during
my
time
at
Berklee
Valencia.
In
order
to
create
this
style
of
composition,
I
will
sometimes
specifically
reference
material
from
some
of
the
contemporary
composers
that
have
influenced
me,
using
stylistically
similar
chord
progressions
and
guitar
sounds,
while
also
allowing
the
information
I
have
learned
while
studying
jazz
to
be
prominent
throughout,
all
the
time
striving
to
ensure
the
influence
of
non-‐jazz
and
jazz
music
remain
noticeable
throughout.
2.3
–Why
This
Approach?
As
previously
mentioned,
the
idea
of
having
a
conflict
between
the
music
that
initially
sparked
our
interest
and
the
music
we
study
is
a
common
theme
among
contemporary
jazz
performers.
One
way
in
which
this
can
be
demonstrated
is
by
the
large
number
of
successful
contemporary
jazz
composers
that
include
their
own
arrangements
of
rock/pop/electronic
music
in
their
releases.
Some
examples
of
jazz
musicians
of
today
covering
other
artists
include;
•
Robert
Glasper
–
Smells
Like
Teen
Spirit
(Nirvana)
•
The
Bad
Plus
–
Flim
(Aphex
Twin)
•
Brad
Mehldau
–
Paranoid
Android
(Radiohead)
•
Christian
Scott
–
The
Eraser
(Thom
Yorke)
•
Vijay
Iyer
–
MmmHmm
(Flying
Lotus)
•
Dave
Douglas
–
Unison
(Bjork)
Similarly
to
me,
I
believe
these
artists
have
a
desire
to
explore
contemporary
music
they
enjoy
and
can
relate
to,
while
also
using
these
familiar
melodies
and
chord
progressions
as
a
vehicle
for
demonstrating
their
improvisational
abilities.
There
is
also
a
recognition
and
respect
from
these
artists
for
the
difficult
nature
of
writing
high
quality,
yet
accessible
music.
The
difference
is
that
I
plan
to
keep
this
ideal
prominent
but
through
original
compositions.
Another
reason
this
approach
to
composing
and
performing
contemporary
jazz
music
appeals
to
people
is
that
it
creates
the
possibility
for
a
wider
audience.
The
general
public
can
easily
be
turned
off
by
the
prospect
of
listening
to
(and
especially
paying
for)
jazz
music,
as
the
typical
association
is
with
dense,
complicated
harmony
and
melody,
combined
with
long
solos
that
can
be
difficult
to
comprehend
without
some
kind
of
musical
training.
Writing
and
performing
with
more
accessibility
in
mind,
while
still
maintaining
artistic
integrity,
is
beneficial
for
everyone
as
the
combination
of
high
level
musicianship
with
more
easy
to
digest
chords
and
melodies,
will
create
the
likelihood
of
a
wider
interest
in
live
performance
of
the
music,
as
well
as
more
potential
for
sales/downloads
of
the
EP.
2.4
-‐
Expected
Outcomes
The
main
expected
outcome
from
this
project
is
to
develop
my
skills
and
knowledge
as
a
composer,
as
well
as
become
more
aware
of
what
it
is
that
appeals
to
me
as
a
writer,
and
the
most
effective
ways
to
impart
my
musical
tastes
into
a
body
of
work
that
can
have
all
the
qualities
I
previously
spoke
of,
artistic
integrity,
musical
accessibility,
and
a
successful
combination
of
the
improvisational
elements
of
jazz
with
the
influences
of
other
musical
genres.
A
second
outcome
from
this
project
is
to
have
an
EP
that
will
be
available
for
release
before
the
end
of
the
summer
2014
semester
at
Berklee
Valencia.
This
proposed
outcome
has
been
aided
enormously
by
the
fact
that
I
was
signed
as
an
artist
by
Disrupción
Records,
the
student-‐run,
Berklee
Valencia
record
label.
This
development
means
that
I
will
have
a
team
of
people
to
help
with
choosing
platforms
to
release
the
EP,
as
well
as
in
promotion,
artwork,
and
creating
as
much
interest
in
the
project
as
is
possible.
Compositional
Analysis
1
–
“Lark”
1.1
–
Initial
Intention
For
this
piece,
my
presence
at
Berklee
Valencia
was
a
huge
factor
in
influencing
my
compositional
process.
The
diversity
of
the
student
body
at
this
campus
means
that
musical
traditions
and
influences
are
plentiful
and
wide-‐ranging.
Many
of
the
students
here
display
the
influences
of
the
traditional
music
of
their
country
quite
prominently
in
their
work,
or
at
least
have
a
strong
awareness
and
knowledge
of
these
musical
roots.
Despite
the
fact
that
members
of
my
family
work
specifically
with
traditional
Irish
music,
and
the
fact
that
I
grew
up
in
an
area
where
live
traditional
Irish
music
can
be
heard
in
many
venues
on
a
daily
basis,
I
have
rarely,
in
fact
almost
never,
played
traditional
Irish
music
and
only
possess
the
most
basic
knowledge
of
the
genre.
While
studying
at
Berklee
Valencia,
my
fellow
students
made
me
feel
like
I
should
make
an
effort
to
be
much
more
aware
of
the
musical
heritage
of
my
country,
and
therefore,
for
this
composition
I
decided
I
would
search
for
some
elements
of
traditional
Irish
music
that
I
could
incorporate
into
my
own
compositions,
both
in
order
to
provide
myself
with
a
fresh
approach
to
composing,
as
well
as
increasing
my
own
knowledge
of
the
genre.
1.2
-‐
Search
and
Solidification
of
Ideas
Once
the
decision
was
made
to
incorporate
traditional
Irish
melodies
with
this
composition,
specific
recordings
were
chosen
as
a
starting
point.
I
listened
to
albums
by
“The
Bothy
Band”,
as
well
as
“Planxty”,
and
many
other
classic
recordings
of
Irish
traditional
music.
While
these
recordings
were
exquisite
in
terms
of
their
music,
I
found
it
difficult
to
translate
the
information
into
something
I
could
use
in
one
of
my
own
compositions.
Because
of
this
I
chose
to
delve
into
a
slightly
more
modern
sound
and
began
listening
to,
and
transcribing
sections
of,
an
album
titled
“The
Storm”
by
Irish
traditional/fusion
band
“Moving
Hearts”.
I
instantly
found
that
while
melodically,
the
information
was
sometimes
the
exact
same
as
in
the
previous
recordings
I
had
listened
to,
I
felt
more
connected
to
the
music,
most
likely
because
the
instrumentation
is
closer
to
what
I
intended
to
use,
ie
electric
instruments,
drum
set,
etc.,
but
possibly
also
because
I
have
a
personal
connection
to
the
group
as
one
of
my
former
teachers
is
the
drummer.
I
was
instantly
astounded
at
the
melodic
wealth
on
offer
in
these
recordings,
as
I
often
struggle
to
write
clear,
concise,
and
catchy
melodies,
to
be
confronted
with
this
constantly
changing
yet
memorable
melodic
style
made
quite
an
impression
on
me.
Also,
the
fact
that
they
achieve
a
high
level
of
sophistication
with
their
melodies
while
never
straying
from
diatonic
notes
played
over
very
simple
harmony
was
a
lesson
to
me
in
the
fact
that
complexity
is
not
necessary
to
create
interest.
Here
are
some
short
examples
of
melodic
ideas
contained
within
one
track.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
Track
1
Lark
–
Melodic
Wealth
Because
of
the
enormous
volume
of
material
on
offer
in
this
recording,
it
was
apparent
that
the
scope
would
have
to
be
narrowed
to
just
focusing
on
one
track,
and
even
then
on
a
very
small
portion
of
this
one
track.
The
composition
that
seemed
most
suitable
is
titled
“The
Lark”,
the
first
track
taken
from
the
album
“The
Storm”.
1.3
–
The
Writing
Process
As
previously
stated
I
decided
that
in
order
to
begin
composing
with
the
influence
of
this
track
in
mind,
I
would
need
to
focus
on
a
very
small
amount
of
the
information
contained
within
it.
The
process
of
choosing
which
parts
to
use
was
quite
simple,
two
very
small
melodic
ideas
that
had
a
very
strong
appeal
on
first
listen
were
chosen,
and
working
with
these
ideas
in
order
to
create
an
A
and
B
section
melody
for
the
piece
was
the
beginning
process
of
the
composition.
Here
are
the
two
melodic
ideas
chosen
as
the
starting
point
for
the
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
Track
2
Lark
–
Original
A
and
B
Section
After
transcribing
and
then
playing
the
first
example
a
few
times
on
my
instrument,
I
stopped
playing
the
melody
exactly
as
it
was
on
the
recording
and
let
myself
play
it
in
a
manner
that
felt
more
natural.
I
then
recorded
myself
playing
this
new
version
of
the
melody
and
transcribed
what
I
was
playing.
The
result
was
that
there
was
a
time
signature
change
from
4/4
to
5/4
in
bar
two
of
the
melody,
and
also
some
notes
were
removed
from
the
end
of
the
original
motif
because
it
seemed
that
playing
the
motif
in
it’s
entirety
sounded
too
specifically
like
Irish
traditional
music
and
was
too
far
a
departure
from
the
contemporary
jazz
style
that
was
desired.
As
well
as
this,
the
tempo
was
reduced
to
make
the
melody
more
playable
and
also
let
the
tension
be
created
by
the
chord/melody
combination,
as
well
as
the
stop-‐time
hits,
rather
than
by
the
high
tempo
of
the
composition.
On
listening
to
the
original
track
I
noticed
that
there
was
a
section
where
this
melody
was
played
with
stop-‐time
hits,
and
decided
that
using
this
idea
might
be
a
very
effective
way
to
create
interesting
parts
for
the
band
to
perform
while
the
melody
was
being
played.
In
order
to
decide
which
chords
to
use,
effective
moments
to
place
the
hits
were
chosen,
then
different
chord
voicings
were
tried,
placing
the
melody
note
on
top.
Aside
from
the
first
hit
on
beat
one
of
the
first
bar,
all
the
hits
are
placed
on
the
last
note
of
each
short
melodic
phrase.
The
chords
that
were
most
effective
to
be
placed
on
these
hits
were
Lydian
and
Altered
voicings,
as
these
choices
kept
the
contemporary
jazz
feel
prominent,
even
though
the
melody
itself
was
quite
simple.
In
order
to
move
from
the
A
section
to
the
B,
the
melody
needed
some
kind
of
tag,
or
repeated
figure,
to
make
it
seem
more
obviously
like
the
end
of
a
phrase.
It
seemed
the
best
way
to
do
this
would
be
to
sequence
the
last
small
motif
of
the
melodic
phrase
and
then
repeat
it
down
a
tone,
before
repeating
it
down
a
tone
again,
finishing
with
a
rest
of
six
beats
before
changing
to
the
B
section.
The
rest
lasting
six
beats
was
again
decided
by
listening
back
to
a
recording
of
myself
playing
the
change
between
the
sections,
playing
what
came
naturally
and
then
writing
it
down
after
the
fact.
Again,
Lydian
chords
were
the
most
effective
for
each
hit
as
they
gave
me
the
modern,
open
feel
appropriate
to
the
piece.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
that
contains
the
melodic
idea
from
the
original
recording,
followed
by
the
A
section
of
my
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
Track
3
Lark
–
A
Section
Melody
For
the
B
section
of
the
piece,
the
original
melody
was
used
almost
exactly
as
on
the
original
recording,
the
only
difference
being
that
the
original
phrase
is
four
bars
long,
whereas
in
the
composition
only
the
first
two
bars
of
the
melody
are
repeated
rather
than
playing
the
third
and
fourth
bars,
thereby
creating
an
effect
closer
to
an
ostinato
than
what
would
be
strictly
considered
a
melody.
The
reason
this
was
done
was
that
the
two
bar
phrase
was
powerful
enough
by
itself
to
warrant
being
repeated
without
variation.
To
complement
this
it
seemed
a
rising
chromatic
chord
sequence
played
underneath
it
would
add
to
the
drama
and
tension.
This
technique
of
combining
a
simple
melodic
idea
with
a
chromatically
moving
chord
sequence
is
something
used
to
great
effect
by
Kurt
Rosenwinkel,
particularly
on
his
composition
“Zhivago”.
Similarly
to
Kurt’s
approach,
in
this
case
the
voicing
is
kept
the
same
and
the
bass
note
ascends
chromatically,
and
due
to
the
repetition
of
notes
within
each
chord,
the
sound
remains
aurally
cohesive.
Because
this
type
of
approach
is
very
guitar
driven
the
melody
was
switched
to
the
piano,
which
also
helped
create
a
new
atmosphere
for
the
new
section.
A
crescendo
spread
over
the
course
of
the
entire
B
section
seemed
an
effective
method
to
capture
the
repetitive,
cyclic
feel
of
this
melody,
while
also
maintaining
the
interest
of
the
audience.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
original
melody,
followed
by
an
excerpt
of
the
B
section
from
my
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
track
4
–
Lark
–
B
Section
Melody
After
the
B
Section
the
piece
returns
back
to
a
shortened
version
of
the
A
Section,
this
time
playing
the
same
melody
but
going
straight
to
the
second
time
ending.
The
melody
is
written
for
the
piano
part
to
add
some
extra
force
and
also
create
a
different
texture
to
the
first
A
section,
as
the
audience
has
already
heard
this
material.
From
here
there
is
a
transition
to
the
first
solo,
and
in
order
to
create
an
interesting
transition
to
the
solo
form,
the
first
note
of
the
solo
is
the
last
note
in
the
melodic
sequence
the
audience
had
previously
heard.
This
is
an
effective
way
of
showing
the
same,
or
at
least
similar,
information
while
also
surprising
the
listener
with
a
new
development.
As
there
had
been
a
lot
of
tension
built
in
each
section
of
the
composition
so
far,
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo
needed
a
slightly
more
relaxed
feel
than
the
previous
sections.
The
method
for
achieving
this
was
to
begin
the
solo
with
the
same
chords
as
the
B
section
but
this
time,
play
each
chord
for
an
entire
bar,
rather
than
just
two
beats.
This
achieved
the
necessary
effect
of
having
more
space,
while
still
retaining
the
mood
created
in
the
previous
sections.
The
next
section
of
the
solo
then
repeats
the
same
chords,
but
this
time
just
for
two
beats
each.
After
this
the
solo
form
then
changes
to
chords
based
on
the
A
section,
before
returning
to
the
chromatically
moving
chords,
this
time
transposed
a
minor
3rd
up
from
where
they
originally
were,
once
again
with
the
intention
presenting
similar
information
from
a
new
angle
in
order
to
maintain
the
listener’s
interest.
This
desire
to
keep
the
listener’s
focus,
through
transposition
and
compositional
surprises,
is
something
that
I
was
very
aware
of
in
terms
of
my
initial
intention
of
keeping
the
contemporary
jazz
feel
of
the
piece
while
still
having
the
listenability
of
which
I
spoke
earlier.
To
end
the
guitar
solo
there
is
the
subtle
introduction
of
a
short
melodic
idea,
played
just
once
by
the
guitar,
then
repeated
by
the
piano
as
part
of
the
accompaniment.
This
melodic
phrase
is
then
played
very
loudly,
and
powerfully,
by
the
entire
band
before
everyone
dropping
out
abruptly
to
begin
the
piano
solo.
The
piano
solo
begins
with
the
piano
playing
this
melodic
phrase
alone,
before
then
playing
over
a
variation
on
the
A
section
chord
sequence.
I
purposely
wrote
this
as
part
of
the
arrangement
as
I
knew
the
part
was
going
to
be
played
by
Piotr
Orzechowski,
a
pianist
that
has
a
huge
amount
of
experience
and
skill
in
the
discipline
of
solo
piano.
After
sixteen
bars
the
band
re-‐enters.
The
final
section
of
the
piano
solo
is
played
over
the
B
section
chords,
with
the
guitar
playing
the
B
section
melody
while
the
piano
continues
to
solo.
This
again
is
a
repetition
of
previously
heard
material
but
in
a
different
context;
melody
that
was
previously
played
by
piano
is
now
played
by
guitar.
Similarly
to
the
end
of
the
guitar
solo,
piano
solo
ends
with
the
entire
band
playing
a
melodic
motif
with
a
crescendo.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
containing
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo,
transition
to
the
piano
solo,
and
ending
of
the
piano
solo.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
5
–
Solo
Transitions
After
the
piano
solo
there
is
an
entirely
new
section
that
ends
the
composition.
For
the
section
I
very
much
displayed
the
influence
of
rock
music
on
my
compositional
approach,
the
hits
played
by
piano
and
drums
take
their
influence
from
the
Led
Zeppelin
composition
“Immigrant
Song”,
while
the
guitar
part,
which
appears
after
four
bars,
takes
it’s
influence
from
the
extended
techniques
used
by
Tom
Morello
of
the
group,
Rage
Against
The
Machine.
While
this
section
is
very
different
from
what
preceded
it,
I
kept
some
reference
to
the
previous
written
sections
by
having
the
bass
play
a
repeated
figure
that
is
actually
the
first
five
notes
of
the
A
section
melody.
Despite
the
rock
influence
present
on
what
each
instrument
is
playing,
I
maintained
the
contemporary
jazz
feel
by
having
the
piano
play
a
D7#9b13,
which
keeps
a
harmonic
density
more
commonly
found
in
contemporary
jazz
than
rock.
Here
is
a
short
excerpt
of
the
final
section
of
the
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–Track
6
-‐
Lark
–
End
Section
1.4
-‐
Rehearsal
and
Adjustments
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
first
rehearsal
of
each
composition
usually
highlighted
the
areas
that
needed
adjustment
in
terms
of
arrangement,
orchestration
etc.
The
first
issue
that
arose
was
that
the
drummer
had
initially
been
instructed
to
play
through
the
hits
in
the
C
Section
of
the
melody,
while
the
rest
of
the
band
continued
to
play
the
melody
in
the
same
manner
as
the
A
section.
It
was
quickly
apparent
that
this
idea
didn’t
really
work,
as
the
rhythmic
complexity
of
what
was
written
for
the
guitar,
bass,
and
piano,
did
not
lend
itself
to
having
a
more
open
drum
feel
underneath
it.
The
support
provided
by
the
drums
playing
the
same
rhythm
as
the
rest
of
the
ensemble
meant
there
was
a
much
more
stable
and
coherent
feel
to
the
section.
Also,
during
the
rehearsal
the
drummer
was
asked
to
play
a
constant
quarter
note
on
each
beat
in
order
to
help
the
rest
of
us
to
play
our
parts,
but
this
would
not
be
necessary
in
the
recording
session,
as
we
would
be
playing
to
a
click
track.
After
listening
back
to
the
recording
the
decision
was
taken
to
change
the
introduction
of
the
composition
completely.
Initially
it
was
written
that
the
guitar
would
begin
the
piece
by
itself,
playing
the
first
phrase
of
the
A
section
melody,
before
being
joined
by
the
band
for
the
melody.
However,
this
introduction
was
too
brief,
and
also
it
meant
the
melody
was
being
played
too
many
times
at
the
beginning
of
the
piece.
It
seemed
a
longer
introduction
was
necessary,
something
that
would
ease
the
listener
into
the
composition.
In
order
to
achieve
this
a
variation
on
the
B
Section
chords
was
played,
with
a
long
crescendo
over
a
period
of
sixteen
bars.
The
first
three
chords
of
the
pattern
were
used
rather
than
all
four
because
it
gave
the
section
more
space,
and
helped
create
an
ethereal
yet
mildly
anxious
mood,
which
is
what
was
appropriate
to
the
piece.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
introduction
and
A
section
of
the
rehearsal
recording.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
7
–
Lark
Rehearsal
Intro
and
A
Section
After
listening
to
the
final
section
of
the
piece
it
seemed
that
while
the
guitar
part
using
extended
techniques,
(playing
behind
the
nut,
artificial
harmonics,
lots
of
distortion)was
interesting,
after
hearing
it
repeated
so
many
times
it
became
mundane.
In
order
to
fix
this,
the
part
was
changed
to
have
four
bars
of
just
rhythm
section
before
entering
with
the
guitar
part.
This
had
the
effect
of
easing
the
listener
in
to
the
new
atmosphere
created
by
this
section,
as
well
as
meaning
that
the
guitar
part
would
not
be
repeated
so
many
times
that
it
lost
it’s
effectiveness.
Another
change
that
I
felt
was
necessary
from
playing
the
composition
at
the
first
rehearsal
was
to
change
the
piano
part
to
be
played
on
keyboard.
The
sound
of
the
piano
didn’t
really
complement
the
modern,
distorted
guitar
sound,
and
it
seemed
that
an
electric
piano,
possibly
a
Fender
Rhodes
sound,
would
be
more
appropriate.
Also,
using
keyboard
over
piano
also
has
the
added
benefit
of
being
much
faster
and
easier
to
set
up
in
the
recording
session.
As
our
recording
sessions
were
just
three
hours
long,
every
opportunity
to
save
time
was
welcome.
1.5
–
Collaborative
Advice
As
mentioned
previously,
after
doing
a
rehearsal
and
a
recording
I
would
usually
take
the
recording
and
Finale
score
of
the
piece
to
Perico
Sambeat
during
his
office
hours
taking
notes
and
what
opinions
he
had
on
the
composition,
being
sure
to
consider
and
possibly
implement
them
before
the
next
rehearsal,
or
in
this
case,
the
recording
session.
The
first
thing
Perico
noticed
was
that
I
was
not
rhythmically
solid
when
playing
the
A
section
melody,
I
was
tending
to
drag
slightly
and
not
be
tight
with
what
the
rhythm
section
was
playing.
This
was
a
problem
that
was
easily
solved
by
making
sure
I
took
the
time
to
work
on
the
melody
with
a
metronome
before
going
to
the
recording
session.
Secondly,
a
suggestion
was
made
regarding
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo.
As
mentioned,
there
needed
to
be
a
release
from
all
the
tension
built
up
during
the
melody,
and
to
achieve
this
I
began
the
guitar
solo
with
the
B
section
chords,
but
this
time
played
for
a
bar
each
rather
than
two
beats.
While
Perico
agreed
with
the
intent
behind
this,
he
suggested
that
playing
these
chord
changes
for
just
eight
bars
was
not
sufficient
for
creating
the
atmosphere
intended.
As
a
result
of
this
advice
for
the
recording
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo
was
changed
to
have
sixteen
bars
of
these
chord
changes
before
reverting
to
eight
bars
of
the
B
section
changes.
He
also
suggested
that
the
rhythm
section
should
play
with
a
more
open
feel
at
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo,
in
order
to
aid
the
creation
of
the
specific
atmosphere
that
was
planned
for.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo
taken
from
the
rehearsal
recording.
•
Souncloud
Playlist
–
Track
8
–
Lark
Rehearsal
-‐
Beginning
of
Guitar
Solo
Another
suggestion
made
was
that
the
drums
could
play
more
busily
and
with
more
fills
for
the
final
section
of
the
piece.
However,
we
tried
this
quickly
before
the
recording
session
began
and
found
that
it
was
not
very
effective,
as
there
was
enough
interesting
information
happening
to
mean
that
the
most
effective
method
for
the
drums
to
complement
the
other
instruments
was
to
play
a
very
straightforward
backbeat,
providing
support
for
the
more
complex
parts
happening
elsewhere.
It
was
also
suggested
that
a
rall
leading
to
the
last
hit
would
be
worth
trying,
but
again,
this
was
tried
and
it
was
decided
that
keeping
everything
tight
and
cohesive
was
the
most
effective
way
to
end
the
piece.
Here
is
an
audio
sample,
taken
from
the
rehearsal
recording,
of
the
final
section
of
the
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
9
–
Lark
Rehearsal
–
End
Section
As
well
as
seeking
compositional
advice
from
Perico,
advice
was
also
sought
on
soloing
over
the
changes
of
the
tune
from
my
private
lesson
instructor,
Israel
Sandoval.
From
listening
to
the
recording
he
could
tell
I
was
struggling
with
soloing
over
the
B
section
chords,
particularly
when
they
were
being
played
for
just
two
bars
each.
In
order
to
help
with
this
we
talked
about
picking
exact
ideas
to
work
on
for
this
section
to
ensure
the
solo
sounded
coherent
and
not
just
the
fast,
random
jumble
of
notes
played
on
the
rehearsal
recording.
We
concluded
that
the
sound
I
was
aiming
for
was
best
achieved
by
superimposing
pentatonic
scales
over
each
of
the
chords,
so
for
Em
and
Fmaj7#11
I
would
play
Em
pentatonic,
for
F#m11b13
and
Gmaj13
I
would
play
F#m
pentatonic.
These
scale
choices
would
also
be
combined
with
the
addition
of
an
extra
note
or
two
in
selected
places.
For
example
for
the
Fmaj7#11
chord
I
could
add
a
b9
to
Em
pentatonic,
for
the
F#m11b13
I
added
a
b13
to
F#m
pentatonic,
and
for
the
Gmaj13
I
once
again
added
a
b9
to
the
F#m
pentatonic.
1.6
–
Recording
The
recording
session
for
this
composition
was
from
20.00
–
23.00
on
the
13th
February
2014
at
the
Ann
Kreis
Scoring
Stage,
Berklee
Valencia.
The
engineer
for
the
session
was
Nick
Zeigler,
and
the
band
consisted
of
Daniel
Toledo
on
bass,
Piotr
Orzechowski
on
piano,
Joshua
Wheatley
on
drums,
as
well
as
myself
on
electric
guitar.
The
session
schedule
was
planned
to
be;
•
20.00-‐21.00
–
Setup.
•
21.00-‐22.00
–
Record
multiple
takes
of
piece.
•
22.00-‐22.30
–
Record
guitar
overdubs.
•
22.30-‐23.00
–
Tear
down
equipment.
The
overdubs
in
question
were
necessary
because
I
had
found
in
rehearsal
that
going
from
the
C
Section
melody
to
the
guitar
solo
was
very
difficult
to
achieve
with
accuracy
in
terms
of
switching
on
and
off
pedals.
To
ensure
I
got
a
neat
and
accurate
transition
between
sections
I
decided
to
not
play
the
C
Section
melody
during
the
take
with
the
full
band,
and
just
enter
with
the
first
note
of
the
solo,
overdubbing
the
melodic
part
later.
The
microphones
to
be
used
for
the
session
were
decided
in
advance
by
Nick
and
I
and
consisted
of;
•
Guitar
–
SM57
+
Reyer
121
•
Bass
–
D.I.
•
Keyboards
–
D.I.
•
Drums
–
Kick
-‐
AKG
D112,
Snare
-‐
SM57,
Toms
-‐
Sennheiser
421
Overheads
–
KM
184
All
of
these
microphones
were
ones
I
had
used
in
previous
sessions
that
I
had
achieved
a
sound
I
was
happy
with.
Particularly
the
combination
of
both
the
SM57
and
Reyer
121
on
the
guitar
is
something
I
have
found
to
be
very
effective
in
terms
of
capturing
the
sound
I
desired.
Below
is
a
picture
of
the
floor
plan
drawn
up
before
the
session.
Due
to
the
fact
that
the
keyboards
and
bass
were
being
recorded
through
a
D.I.
the
set
up
was
relatively
fast,
and
this
also
meant
that
we
could
all
record
in
the
same
room
because
the
guitar
amp
would
be
placed
in
the
isolation
booth,
therefore
eliminating
any
possibility
for
sound
bleeding
into
the
drum
microphones.
Due
to
the
fastidiousness
of
Nick
and
I’s
pre-‐production
organisational
efforts,
the
plan
and
agenda
for
the
recording
was
extremely
clear
and
therefore
went
very
smoothly.
The
schedule
was
maintained
and
we
had
ample
time
to
record
several
takes
of
the
track,
as
well
as
do
the
guitar
overdub
of
which
I
previously
spoke.
The
only
aspect
of
the
recording
I
was
unhappy
with
was
the
guitar
part
over
the
end
section
of
the
composition.
I
felt
that
I
hadn’t
played
to
the
part
with
a
level
of
accuracy
I
was
happy
with,
so
to
fix
this
I
booked
a
slot
in
studio
A
and
overdubbed
this
section,
using
the
same
microphones.
In
post-‐production,
I
did
the
edits
of
the
takes
using
Pro
Tools,
the
track
was
mixed
by
Ryan
Renteria,
and
mastered
by
Alan
Tishk.
The
only
issue
that
arose
in
the
post
production
process
was
that
the
intent
of
having
the
keyboard
melody
at
section
B
begin
very
quietly
and
increase
in
volume
over
the
course
of
the
section
was
not
very
effective,
as
it
created
a
sense
of
uncertainty
as
to
what
was
happening
at
the
start
of
the
section.
This
problem
was
easily
solved
by
simply
raising
he
volume
of
the
keyboard
in
the
mix,
thereby
creating
a
more
purposeful
feel
to
the
beginning
of
the
B
section.
Here
is
the
audio
for
the
final
product
of
my
composition
“Lark”.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
10
–
Lark
1.7
–
Lessons
Learned
The
main
area
in
which
I
increased
my
knowledge
over
the
course
of
writing,
rehearsing,
and
recording
this
piece
was
in
the
field
of
traditional
Irish
music.
Studying
and
listening
to
the
recordings
before
I
began
to
write
was
extremely
enlightening,
reinforcing
my
initial
feeling
that
it
is
important
for
me
to
make
more
of
an
effort
to
increase
my
knowledge
in
terms
of
the
traditional
music
of
my
country.
The
main
area
that
impressed
me
the
most
was
the
seemingly
inexhaustible
supply
of
melodic
material
contained
within
each
track.
To
be
able
to
continually
have
memorable,
interesting,
technically
demanding
melodies,
while
never
really
straying
from
diatonic
note
choices
and
harmony,
is
something
I
could
benefit
from
studying
more
of,
as
I
have
a
tendency
to
overcomplicate
melodies
and
therefore
dilute
their
effectiveness.
The
time
I
spent
researching
this
music
has
definitely
ensured
that
in
the
future
I
will
spend
time
working
on
traditional
Irish
music,
both
in
order
to
have
a
better
understanding
of
the
musical
heritage
of
my
country,
as
well
as
to
reap
the
benefits
of
absorbing
some
of
it’s
musical
characteristics.
Another
area
in
which
I
increased
my
knowledge
was
in
terms
of
the
use
of
minor
pentatonic
scales
with
added
altered
notes.
Using
minor
pentatonics
over
major
chords
is
an
approach
I
regularly
employ
in
both
composition
and
improvising,
but
the
simple
idea
of
just
adding
one
or
two
notes
contained
within
the
chord
of
the
moment
to
the
minor
pentatonic
scale
had
never
really
occurred
to
me.
This
new
skill
has
given
me
a
new
sound
and
colour
to
use
for
both
my
compositions
and
solos.
Whereas
previously
my
use
of
minor
pentatonics,
while
being
a
sound
I
enjoy,
may
have
become
slightly
predictable
and
overused,
now
I
have
been
provided
with
a
way
to
keep
the
sound
and
feel
that
I
enjoy
while
adding
a
new
dimension
to
keep
both
the
listener,
and
myself,
interested.
A
third
area
in
which
I
could
say
I
increased
my
learning
was
in
the
compositional
approach
of
the
piece.
While
I
regularly
use
very
specific
references
and
influences
when
I
compose,
I
had
never
specifically
focused
on
an
existing
melody
and
then
altered
it
to
fit
my
compositional
needs.
This
is
something
I
would
definitely
consider
doing
in
future
compositions,
as
it
was
a
great
way
to
provide
myself
with
a
starting
point
for
ideas,
although
I
would
have
to
be
careful
about
how
I
do
this
with
other
compositions.
Using
traditional
melodies
is
perfectly
acceptable
because
they
are
all
in
the
public
domain
and
not
under
copyright,
if
I
were
to
do
the
same
approach
for
copyrighted
material
I
would
be
at
risk
of
entering
morally
dubious
territory,
as
I
would
not
be
comfortable
with
the
idea
of
directly
copying
from
another
person’s
melodic
work.
I
also
feel
that
this
approach
of
looking
at
a
previously
unfamiliar
style
of
music
in
order
to
gain
compositional
ideas
is
a
great
way
to
introduce
oneself
to
new
music,
instantly
applying
the
benefits
of
some
new
knowledge
to
your
own
playing.
2
–
“Umbra”
2.1
–
Initial
Intention
For
this
piece,
I
employed
the
musical
influence
of
one
of
my
former
classmates
on
my
own
playing.
While
studying
for
my
undergraduate
degree,
I
spent
four
years
in
the
same
class
as
fellow
Irish
guitarist,
Chris
Guilfoyle.
Chris
is
an
extremely
skilled
composer
and
guitarist,
in
both
the
jazz
and
electronic
music
idioms.
I
had
always
been
a
fan
of
his
compositional
style,
and
spending
such
a
long
time
studying
in
the
same
composition
class,
I
am
quite
familiar
with
his
approach.
I
decided
that
rather
than
be
envious
of
his
work,
I
would
be
better
off
learning
from
his
style
and
applying
it
to
my
own
writing.
I
decided
straight
away
that
although
I
wanted
Chris’
music
to
be
the
main
influence
for
this
piece,
I
did
not
want
to
directly
use
any
of
his
written
material
as
a
reference,
as
this
would
be
more
like
copying
rather
than
being
influenced
by.
Instead,
I
just
tried
to
think
about
some
of
the
characteristics
of
his
work
and
then
apply
it
to
the
piece
I
wished
to
write.
The
main
characteristics
were;
•
Dense
sounding,
unusual
chords.
•
Complex
melodies.
•
Use
of
guitar
effects
pedals.
•
The
influence
of
electronic
music.
With
these
influences
in
mind
I
set
out
to
write
a
piece
that
had
some
of
the
characteristics
of
Chris’
work,
but
that
would
still
fit
with
my
own
musical
style.
2.2
–
The
Writing
Process
Before
beginning
the
piece
I
knew
that
I
wanted
to
write
this
composition
with
a
groove
based
on
the
drum
and
bass
style
of
electronic
music.
This
is
an
influence
taken
from
the
music
of
Chris
Guilfoyle,
but
as
well
as
that
it
is
a
style
that
I
have
also
admired
many
times
in
the
work
of
Erik
Truffaz,
Jojo
Mayer,
and
Aphex
Twin.
Knowing
the
rhythmic
style
of
the
piece
before
beginning
meant
that
the
rest
of
the
material
could
be
written
using
what
is
commonly
found
in
this
style;
relatively
slow
harmonic
rhythm,
chromatically
moving
basslines,
tension
created
by
the
busyness
of
the
drum
feel,
etc.
The
first
part
of
the
composition
that
I
began
working
on
was
the
chords
for
the
A
section.
I
had
been
experimenting
with
the
idea
of
constant
structures
in
guitar
voicings,
and
felt
this
was
the
perfect
opportunity
to
use
them.
The
idea
in
question
was
to
begin
with
an
Fmaj13
voicing
and
then
shift
it
downward
by
a
tone
each
time,
this
had
the
effect
of
having
an
initially
aurally
pleasant
chord
that
became
darker
and
more
dissonant
each
time
it
moved.
The
resulting
chords
were;
Fmaj13,
Ebmaj13b9,
Db69(addb9).
Initially
it
seemed
that
having
a
three
chord
sequence
would
be
an
interesting
way
of
creating
a
cyclic
feel
to
the
A
section,
but
after
playing
through
it
a
few
times
it
became
apparent
that
the
density
of
the
chords
combined
with
this
cyclic
feel
actually
made
the
sequence
quite
unpleasant
to
listen
to.
To
fix
this
one
extra
chord
was
added,
keeping
the
same
structure
and
once
again
moving
down
a
tone,
this
time
producing
a
Bm11
chord.
The
effect
of
having
an
aurally
pleasant
chord
at
the
beginning
and
end
of
the
sequence
gave
it
a
sense
of
overall
balance
and
relief
once
the
sequence
reached
the
fourth
chord.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
A
section
chords,
as
played
at
the
introduction
of
the
piece.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
11
–
Umbra
A
Section
Chords
It
had
been
decided
that
complex
melodies
were
one
of
the
influences
that
should
be
channeled
so
a
technique
was
employed
described
to
us
in
a
composition
masterclass
by
Berklee
Valencia
faculty
member,
Polo
Ortí.
Polo
told
us
his
method
of
coming
up
with
melodies
was
to
solo
over
the
changes
and
then
pick
out
the
parts
he
liked
and
use
them
as
a
melody.
This
is
an
effective
method
for
creating
a
complex
melody
so
I
looped
the
chord
progression
on
a
sequencer
and
then
recorded
myself
soloing
over
the
changes.
I
then
would
listen
back
to
what
I
played,
choose
some
appropriate
and
effective
parts,
then
solo
again,
this
time
keeping
whatever
I
liked
from
the
previous
take,
repeating
this
process
until
there
was
a
full
A
Section
melody
written
down.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
A
section
melody.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
12
–
Umbra
–
A
Section
For
the
B
Section,
in
order
to
provide
contrast,
as
well
as
a
relief
from
the
busyness
of
the
A
Section,
I
decided
that
I
would
reverse
the
roles
of
the
harmonic
and
melodic
instruments,
this
time
making
the
melody
extremely
simple
and
increasing
the
amount
of
movement
in
the
chord
sequence.
This
section
seemed
appropriate
to
introduce
chromatic
movement
in
the
bass
line.
Slash
chords
were
used
to
achieve
this
movement
while
tensions
were
added
to
the
voicings
to
create
the
necessary
harmonic
flavour.
An
Eb
note
was
kept
as
the
top
note
of
each
voicing,
so
that
although
the
chords
are
very
different
and
not
necessarily
belonging
to
the
same
harmonic
universe,
there
is
a
consistency
between
the
changes
as
the
top
note
keeps
all
the
chords
connected.
The
plan
was
to
keep
the
B
Section
melody
extremely
simple,
in
order
to
this
I
decided
on
just
a
two
note
motif
with
a
harmony
part
underneath
repeating
the
Eb
note
common
to
all
the
chords.
The
simplicity
of
the
melody
of
this
section
is
a
welcome
respite
from
the
freneticism
of
the
previous
section,
and
also
the
space
created
by
having
a
static
melody
also
gives
the
rhythm
section
a
chance
to
play
more
busily
and
create
new
ideas
of
interest
within
their
parts.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
B
Section
of
the
piece.
•
Souncloud
Playlist
Track
13
–
Umbra
–
B
Section
After
repeating
the
A
and
B
sections,
it
seemed
that
there
needed
to
be
a
new
segment
of
melodic
information
before
going
to
solos.
In
keeping
with
the
overall
compositional
aspiration
of
maintaining
the
listenability
and
accessibility
of
the
piece,
it
appeared
that
a
minor
pentatonic
based
melody
would
be
appropriate
as
it
would
be
a
familiar
sound
to
the
listeners
ear,
as
well
as
being
a
middle
ground
between
the
extreme
busyness
of
the
A
Section
and
the
melodic
simplicity
of
the
B
Section.
With
this
in
mind
the
chords
were
worked
on
first,
choosing
to
maintain
the
chromatic
bass
movement
of
the
B
Section,
this
time
with
slightly
different
chord
tensions.
The
structure
of
these
chords
once
again
take
their
influence
from
the
playing
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel.
The
chord
is
constructed
by
playing
a
root,
third,
and
an
open
G
string,
then
playing
a
bass
note
a
fourth
down
from
the
root
note.
All
the
notes
aside
from
the
open
G
are
then
moved
down
a
semitone
for
the
second
chord.
The
interval
of
a
fourth
at
the
bottom
of
the
chord,
combined
with
the
interval
of
a
major
seventh
contained
within
the
rest
of
the
chord,
creates
a
very
dark
and
relatively
dissonant
sound.
In
order
to
once
again
keep
coherence
between
the
chords,
Eb
was
added
as
the
top
note
of
the
chord,
this
being
the
#9
of
the
C
major
7th
chord
and
the
major
3rd
of
the
Bmaj
chord.
Then
begins
the
first
solo,
which
is
played
by
guitar.
The
structure
of
this
is
that
the
guitar
plays
over
the
first
sixteen
bars
of
the
A
Section,
which
is
repeated,
then
followed
by
the
next
part
of
the
A
section,
played
for
sixteen
bars.
As
a
written
section
between
the
first
and
second
solo,
the
third
melodic
section
is
repeated,
played
by
both
piano
and
guitar,
this
time
with
the
guitar
playing
the
part
a
fifth
above
the
piano.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
end
of
the
guitar
solo,
going
into
the
melodic
section
before
the
piano
solo.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
14
–
Umbra
–
End
of
Solo
For
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo,
it
seemed
that
it
would
be
effective
to
have
a
break
from
the
aggressiveness
of
the
rhythms
of
the
composition
up
to
this
point,
so
the
guitar
and
bass
drop
out
while
the
drums
were
instructed
to
play
a
less
busy
figure
than
in
the
previous
section.
The
piano
and
drums
play
together
for
16
bars
before
being
rejoined
by
the
bass
and
returning
to
the
drum
and
bass
influenced
groove
of
the
previous
sections.
The
chords
for
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo
are
taken
from
the
B
Section
of
the
piece,
then
after
thirty-‐two
bars
of
these
chords
the
guitar
re-‐enters
with
a
melodic
line
while
the
piano
continues
to
solo,
this
time
over
the
A
section
chords.
The
purpose
of
the
guitar
melody
line
is
once
again
to
provide
a
variation
on
material
that
has
already
been
heard,
while
also
surprising
the
listener
with
something
unexpected.
Here
is
an
audio
extract
of
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo,
rejoining
of
the
band,
and
introduction
of
guitar.
•
Souncloud
Playlist
–
Track
15
–
Umbra
Piano
Solo
In
order
to
end
the
piece,
a
drum
solo
seemed
appropriate.
To
provide
an
ostinato
for
the
drums
to
solo
over,
a
repeated
melodic
figure
was
developed
over
the
chords
of
the
B
Section.
Similarly
to
the
B
Section
of
the
melody
the
scale
used
to
create
the
melody
was
Eb
minor
pentatonic,
thereby
retaining
a
similar
flavour
to
the
previously
heard
material
but
still
providing
the
listener
with
something
new.
This
figure
is
repeated
until
a
cue
from
the
drummer,
with
everybody
playing
a
hit
on
the
last
melody
note
of
the
phrase.
2.3
–
Rehearsal
and
Adjustments
The
first
rehearsal
of
this
piece
immediately
brought
about
one
extreme
change
to
the
composition.
The
melody
was
initially
written
to
be
doubled
by
saxophone
for
the
A
Section,
and
then
the
melody
was
to
be
divided
between
guitar
and
saxophone
for
the
B
Section.
As
it
turned
out,
the
saxophonist
didn’t
show
up
for
the
rehearsal.
While
this
seemed
to
be
a
problem
at
first,
it
turned
out
to
be
quite
convenient
as
after
some
quick
adjustments
it
was
decided
that
saxophone
was
not
necessary
for
the
composition.
Firstly
it
was
decided
that
the
melody
at
A
could
stand
by
itself
without
needing
to
be
doubled
by
piano,
then
for
the
B
section
it
was
possible
for
the
guitar
to
play
both
the
parts
that
were
written
for
saxophone
and
guitar.
This
turned
out
to
function
quite
well
as
for
the
first
eight
bars
the
guitar
plays
the
two
note
melody,
before
adding
the
lower
Eb
drone
that
was
intended
for
saxophone.
Here
is
the
resulting
melody
for
the
B
Section,
With
the
guitar
playing
both
the
parts
written
for
guitar
and
saxophone.
Another
adjustment
to
be
made
involved
the
melodic
section
leading
in
to
the
guitar
solo.
Initially
this
phrase
was
to
be
played
for
eight
bars
by
just
saxophone,
with
the
keyboards
joining
for
the
repetition
of
these
eight
bars,
while
guitar
played
the
chords.
In
the
rehearsal,
the
piano
took
the
first
eight
bars
of
the
melody
while
the
guitar
played
chords
for
the
first
eight,
beginning
to
play
melody
for
the
second
eight.
On
listening
back
to
the
rehearsal
recording,
it
was
apparent
that
while
the
dense
and
dark
mood
created
by
these
specific
chord
voicings
was
very
effective
when
played
by
just
guitar,
in
the
context
of
the
piece
it
didn’t
really
work
as
they
created
an
excess
of
information
in
the
low
register,
cluttering
the
overall
sound.
To
amend
this,
the
solution
was
to
have
the
piano
play
the
melody
for
the
first
eight
bars
with
no
chords
behind
it
and
the
guitar
would
then
join
playing
the
melody
for
the
next
eight
bars.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
this
section
from
the
rehearsal
recording,
then
from
the
final
product.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
16
–
Umbra
–
C
Section
Changes
The
final
aspect
of
the
piece
that
needed
to
be
changed
due
to
the
lack
of
a
saxophone
was
the
end
section.
The
written
part
indicated
that
the
saxophone
should
play
a
harmonization
a
fourth
above
the
melodic
line
written
for
guitar,
instead
of
having
the
keyboard
play
this,
the
use
of
a
guitar
effects
pedal
was
employed,
specifically
a
Digitech
Whammy,
as
this
can
be
programmed
to
harmonise
a
fourth
above.
The
final
change
that
came
about
specifically
as
a
result
of
the
rehearsal
was
regarding
the
drum
part.
The
score
had
indicated
that
for
the
first
sixteen
bars
of
the
introduction
the
drums
should
fill
space,
mostly
using
cymbals,
playing
freely
without
regard
to
the
tempo.
However,
while
following
these
instructions
in
the
rehearsal,
the
drummer
played
a
short
phrase
of
rhythms
in
tempo
on
the
closed
hi-‐hat,
momentarily
creating
a
very
effective
accompaniment
for
the
guitar
part.
Similarly,
for
the
first
sixteen
bars
of
the
piano
solo,
the
score
indicated
that
the
drums
should
play
very
busily,
responding
to
what
the
piano
played,
almost
in
the
form
of
a
dual
solo.
However,
upon
hearing
this
small
section
of
the
drums
playing
this
closed
hi-‐hat
rhythm
for
the
introduction,
it
was
instantly
apparent
that
this
idea,
employed
for
the
entirety
of
each
of
those
separate
sections,
would
be
much
more
effective
than
what
had
originally
been
written
for
the
drummer
to
play.
Here
is
an
audio
extract
of
the
beginning
of
the
piece
from
the
rehearsal
recording,
followed
by
the
beginning
of
the
piece
from
the
final
product.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Umbra
–
Intro
Changes
2.4
–
Collaborative
Advice
Upon
listening
to
the
rehearsal
recording
with
Perico
Sambeat,
he
remarked
that
the
chords
when
played
by
the
keyboards
over
the
A
Section
clashed
with
some
of
the
melody
notes.
This
appeared
to
be
true,
but
upon
investigation
it
seemed
more
likely
that
the
instructions
given
to
the
piano
at
this
part
were
at
the
root
of
the
issue.
As
the
chords
for
the
A
section
are
the
same
for
the
introduction,
they
are
of
course
based
on
a
specific
guitar
voicing
making
up
a
sequence
of;
|
Fmaj13
|
Ebmaj13b9
|
Db69(addb9)|
Bm11
|
The
specific
guitar
voicings
were
written
in
the
piano
part
as
sample
voicings
to
help
with
constructing
these
unusual
chords,
also
with
the
instructions
to
omit
the
5th
during
any
comping.
While
these
voicings
are
very
effective
on
guitar,
this
information
is
probably
far
too
specific
and
limiting
to
give
to
a
pianist.
In
order
to
fix
the
problem
I
then
studied
the
notes
contained
within
the
melody
and
realised
that
they
were
almost
entirely
contained
within
the
Lydian
Augmented
scale
of
each
chord
they
were
being
played
over.
This
meant
that
while
the
chords
for
the
introduction
could
stay
as
specifically
intended
for
guitar,
for
the
melody
the
chords
for
piano
could
be
written
as;
|Fmaj13#5
|
Ebmaj13#5
|
Dbmaj7#5
|
Bm11
|
This
eradicated
the
problem
that
was
noticed
regarding
the
clash
of
melody
and
chord,
as
well
as
having
the
added
bonus
of
allowing
the
pianist
much
more
freedom
of
expression,
as
indicated
in
the
following
recorded
material.
The
first
excerpt
is
from
the
rehearsal
followed
by
the
finished
product.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
18
–
Umbra
–
Voicing
Changes
A
second
point
that
was
raised
in
this
meeting
was
there
was
possibly
too
much
contrast
between
the
A
and
B
Section
melody,
Perico
suggesting
that
perhaps
the
A
Section
melody
could
benefit
from
being
less
busy
and
the
B
Section
could
have
more
movement
melodically.
This
was
a
suggestion
that
made
sense
and
was
worth
considering,
but
due
to
time
constraints
before
the
recording,
was
not
possible
to
investigate
fully.
However,
having
completed
the
recording
with
the
melodies
in
this
manner,
it
seems
that
the
melodic
contrast
between
the
sections
is
very
effective,
as
it
also
allows
room
for
more
contrast
between
what
the
rhythm
section
is
playing
between
the
A
and
B
Sections,
which
was
an
effective
way
of
both
maintaining
the
interest
of
the
listener,
as
well
as
keeping
the
musicians
themselves
engaged.
Having
gained
some
advice
on
the
compositional
aspect
of
the
piece
I
also
met
with
Israel
Sandoval
to
discuss
the
scale
options
available
for
soloing
over
the
tune,
particularly
over
the
A
section
chords.
As
has
been
previously
mentioned,
the
chords
for
this
section
of
the
piece
are
unusual
and
as
a
consequence,
were
quite
difficult
to
solo
comfortably
over.
Together,
Israel
and
I
investigated
what
would
be
possible
options
for
each
chord,
also
with
the
aim
of
discovering
which
options
blended
the
changes
together
with
most
cohesion,
while
also
being
aware
of
what
would
be
a
logical
mental
process
for
changing
between
chords.
The
resulting
scale
chord
relationships
were;
•
Fmaj13
–
D
Minor
(all
variations
of,
Melodic,
Harmonic,
Natural
Minor)
•
Ebmaj13b9
–
D,
Eb,
E,
A,
Bb,
B
–
Limited
Transposition
Scale
•
Db69(addb9)
–
D,
E,
F,
Gb,
G
–
Limited
Transposition
Scale
•
Bm11
–
Bb
Augmented
Scale
The
term
“Limited
Transposition
Scale,”
implies
a
scale
that
fulfills
specific
criteria
with
regards
to
their
symmetry
and
their
interval
groups.
This
was
a
concept
previously
unfamiliar
to
me,
and
was
very
effective
in
terms
of
creating
new
ideas
for
soloing
over
these
chords,
and
for
soloing
in
general.
As
it
turned
out,
because
of
the
changes
to
the
chordal
information
given
to
the
keyboards,
these
scales
were
not
strictly
necessary
for
soloing
over
this
section,
as
Lydian
Augmented
would
now
fit
each
chord.
However,
the
use
of
these
scales
did
provide
an
extra
ingredient
to
employ
during
the
solo
which,
when
combined
with
the
Lydian
Augmented
scales,
created
a
sound
that
was
very
specific
to
this
piece
and
therefore
very
effective.
2.5
–
Recording
The
recording
session
for
“Umbra”
was
20.00-‐23.00,
on
the
9th
April
2014
at
the
Ann
Kreis
Scroing
Stage,
Berklee
Valencia.
The
engineer
for
the
session
was
Alayna
Hughes,
and
the
band
consisted
of
Daniel
Toledo
on
electric
bass,
Piotr
Orzechowski
on
keyboards,
Joshua
Wheatley
on
drums,
as
well
as
myself
on
electric
guitar.
The
session
schedule
was
planned
to
be;
•
20.00-‐21.00
–
Setup.
•
21.00-‐22.30
–
Record
multiple
takes
of
piece.
•
22.30-‐23.00
–
Tear
down
equipment.
The
microphones
to
be
used
for
the
session
were
decided
in
advance
by
Alayna
and
I
and
consisted
of;
•
Guitar
–
SM57
+
Reyer
121
•
Bass
–
D.I.
•
Keyboards
–
D.I.
•
Drums
–
Kick
-‐
AKG
D112,
Snare
-‐
SM57,
Toms
-‐
Sennheiser
421
Overheads
–
KM
184
Below
is
a
picture
of
the
floor
plan
for
the
session.
As
in
the
recording
session
written
about
in
the
previous
chapter,
the
effort
that
went
into
the
pre-‐production
and
organisation
process
meant
that
everything
ran
smoothly
for
the
session,
ensuring
ample
time
was
available
for
recording
enough
takes
until
a
satisfactory
product
was
a
certainty.
In
post-‐production,
I
completed
the
edits
using
Pro
Tools,
the
mix
was
done
by
Ryan
Renteria,
and
mastering
by
Alan
Tishk.
As
the
recording
session
went
very
smoothly
and
the
arrangement
was
well
prepared,
no
problems
arose
in
post
production,
the
only
difficulty
lay
in
choosing
from
the
many
takes,
as
each
had
it’s
own
appeal.
Here
is
the
final
product
of
the
composition
“Umbra”.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
19
-‐
Umbra
2.6
-‐
Lessons
Learned
The
main
area
I
increased
my
knowledge
over
the
course
of
writing
and
arranging
this
piece
was
in
the
field
of
chord-‐scale
relationships.
Learning
about
Limited
Transposition
scales
has
provided
an
area
for
intensive
further
study
in
the
future,
while
also
immediately
granting
me
some
new
sounds
and
ideas
for
my
improvisational
repertoire.
The
second
area
in
which
I
could
say
I
learned,
was
with
regard
the
last
minute
changing
of
the
ensemble
line
up.
While
initially
the
fact
that
the
saxophonist
failed
to
show
up
for
a
rehearsal
was
a
great
source
of
irritation
to
me,
in
the
end
the
composition
ended
up
being
much
more
effective
in
the
quartet
format.
This
was
a
good
lesson
in
terms
of
not
assuming
the
worst
when
presented
with
an
obstacle,
as
well
as
how
to
change
arrangements
quickly
and
intuitively.
Also,
I
learned
that
the
original
intent
for
the
composition
does
not
have
to
be
maintained
in
order
to
end
with
a
satisfactory
product.
After
having
decided
that
the
main
influence
for
the
piece
was
going
to
be
the
work
of
a
certain
composer,
the
more
time
spent
on
the
composition,
the
less
this
seemed
relevant.
However,
starting
with
an
obvious
intent
was
extremely
helpful
in
terms
of
speeding
up
the
composing
process,
as
it
gave
the
beginning
stages
some
guidelines
to
follow
and
an
immediate
focus,
which
was
helpful
in
terms
of
speeding
up
the
decision
making
process.
3
–
“Dip”
3.1
–
Initial
Intention
The
initial
intention
for
this
composition
was
to
build
a
piece
around
a
main
idea
that
employed
the
use
of
extended
guitar
techniques.
The
approach
of
using
unusual
noises
and
textures
on
guitar
is
a
technique
that
takes
its
influence
from
guitarists
such
as
Tom
Morello
and
Jeff
Beck.
The
use
of
harmonics,
bending
of
notes
behind
the
nut
of
the
guitar,
as
well
as
playing
notes
behind
the
nut,
are
all
approaches
that
I
regularly
apply
to
my
playing,
especially
when
performing
in
the
hip-‐hop
genre,
as
the
guitar
can
sometimes
be
in
the
position
of
replicating
a
DJ/turntablist.
It
seemed
that
incorporating
these
techniques
into
an
original
composition
would
be
an
effective
way
of
developing
my
own
voice
both
as
an
instrumentalist
and
as
a
composer.
3.2
–
The
Writing
Process
The
first
step
in
this
composition
was
to
come
up
with
the
extended
technique
idea
that
would
be
the
main
hook,
or
focus,
of
the
piece.
This
was
an
extremely
quick
process
because,
as
mentioned
before,
this
is
an
approach
I
regularly
take
in
my
playing,
and
therefore
have
an
accumulation
of
ideas
to
draw
from.
Also,
this
approach
to
guitar
playing
is
not
very
common
and
as
a
result
it
isn’t
necessary
to
be
painstaking
in
terms
of
attempting
not
to
sound
to
derivative,
most
of
the
sounds
attempted
have
a
character
that
is
particular
to
the
composer.
After
a
short
time
trying
some
ideas,
the
phrase
was
finalised.
It
employs
the
three
techniques
spoken
of
earlier,
harmonics,
bending
behind
the
nut,
and
playing
behind
the
nut,
as
well
as
guitar
effects
pedals
in
the
form
of
distortion
and
digital
delay.
Here
is
an
audio
example
of
the
phrase
in
question.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
20
–
Dip
–
Extended
Techniques
Once
the
motif
was
finalised,
the
next
step
was
to
find
chords
to
complement
it.
Melodic
Minor
harmony
is
an
area
that
was
being
explored
at
that
time
in
my
private
lesson
and
therefore
was
a
sound
that
was
very
present
in
my
playing
at
the
time.
It
seemed
that
the
dark
character
of
a
major7#5
chord
would
be
the
perfect
choice
to
complement
this
motif
and
because
the
motif
is
basically
atonal,
any
combination
of
maj7#5
chords
was
possible.
After
many
varied
attempts
at
different
combinations
and
durations
of
time
for
each
chord.
The
most
effective
solution
was
to
play
Cmaj7#5
and
Ebmaj7#5
for
one
bar
each.
Here
is
an
audio
example
of
the
guitar
motif
played
with
the
harmony.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
21
–
Dip
–
Motif
with
Chords
In
order
to
maintain
a
similar
atmosphere
for
the
introduction
and
the
melody,
it
seemed
that
it
would
be
effective
to
use
the
same
chords,
but
change
the
harmonic
rhythm
in
order
to
provide
a
slight
difference
to
what
had
previously
been
heard.
Therefore
the
chord
qualities
remained
the
same,
Cmaj7#5
and
Ebmaj7#5,
but
this
time
they
are
played
for
two
bars
each.
The
melody
itself
begins
with
a
four
bar
phrase;
The
last
bar
of
this
phrase
is
then
sequenced,
and
repeated
four
times
with
small
ornamentations.
To
end
the
phrase
the
first
two
bars
of
the
of
the
melody
are
repeated,
then
only
the
first
two
notes
of
the
third
bar
are
repeated,
allowing
some
space
before
the
introductory
motif
returns.
The
intent
behind
the
construction
of
this
melody
was,
in
order
to
contrast
with
what
had
preceded
it,
to
keep
it
simple
and
aurally
accessible,
while
the
fact
that
the
repetition
of
the
first
phrase
is
not
concluded
in
the
same
fashion
as
the
first
time
it
is
heard
may
be
an
effective
way
of
surprising
the
listener.
Also,
the
melody
itself
is
not
necessarily
played
strictly
as
written,
artistic
license
is
granted
in
terms
of
string
bends
and
articulation.
Here
is
an
audio
extract
of
the
A
Section
melody.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
22
–
Dip
–
A
Section
Melody
Following
the
melody
is
a
repetition
of
the
extended
techniques
of
the
introduction,
this
time
with
second
half
of
the
phrase
played
first,
once
again
the
intent
behind
this
was
written
with
the
intent
of
repeating
previously
heard
material,
but
with
a
slight
change
to
hold
the
listener’s
interest.
While
writing,
it
seemed
that
simply
repeating
the
information
heard
in
the
A
Section
melody
needed
to
be
heard
again
before
any
new
material
was
introduced.
However,
simply
repeating
the
melody
seemed
too
predictable,
so
the
most
effective
choice
was
to
repeat
the
melody
except
play
a
segment
of
it,
a
few
variations
were
attempted,
eventually
the
most
effective
method
seemed
to
be
to
play
bar
five-‐
twelve
of
the
previously
heard
section.
For
the
B
Section,
the
chords
were
the
first
element
of
the
section
to
be
written.
The
sound
of
a
Cmaj7/G
chord
when
played
on
guitar
using
of
the
open
G,
B,
and
E
strings,
creates
a
light,
yet
unsettling
atmosphere
that
fitted
the
composition
well.
In
order
to
work
this
voicing
into
the
composition,
semi-‐tonal
bass
movement
was
employed,
once
again
with
the
influence
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel’s
compositions
in
mind.
The
bottom
three
notes
of
the
chord
can
be
moved
while
the
open
strings
are
kept
the
same
for
each
voicing,
resulting
in
a
progression
of;
After
experimenting
with
different
places
on
the
fretboard
this
voicing
would
work,
using
a
similar
pattern
starting
with
Bb
as
the
bass
note
proved
to
be
very
effective.
However,
the
structure
of
the
chord
couldn’t
remain
the
same
for
each
voicing
as
it
became
extremely
dissonant.
To
remedy
this
while
still
maintaining
the
chromatic
movement,
the
structure
of
the
voicing
was
changed
slightly
in
order
to
accommodate
the
use
of
open
strings.
The
resulting
progression
was;
At
the
time
of
writing
this
section,
the
actual
chordal
values
were
not
of
prime
importance,
as
the
main
objective
was
to
create
the
necessary
atmosphere
and
mood.
Considering
the
harmonic
content
of
these
voicings
only
became
a
concern
when
writing
the
changes
for
solo
sections.
After
playing
the
progression
a
few
times,
it
seemed
that
a
more
aurally
satisfying
way
for
it
to
be
played
would
be
to
begin
with
the
section
starting
on
Bb,
playing
the
Cmaj7/G
chord
on
what
would
be
bar
five
of
an
eight
bar
sequence.
Melodically,
what
it
seemed
this
section
needed
was
a
repetitive
melodic
figure
that
provided
contrast
with
all
the
chordal
movement.
After
exploring
different
options,
what
was
very
effective
was
maintaining
the
same
top
note
of
the
motif
throughout
the
entire
progression,
while
having
any
movement
kept
to
the
lower
register
of
the
melody.
Despite
the
unusual
harmony
this
provided
a
sense
of
connectedness
throughout
the
section.
After
deciding
on
an
initial
motif
to
complement
the
first
chord,
motivic
transformation
was
applied,
keeping
the
rhythm
the
same
but
changing
the
melody
notes
according
to
the
chord
of
the
moment.
The
most
effective
way
to
play
this
six
bar
phrase
seemed
to
be
to
play
with
just
guitar
and
piano,
then
repeat
it
with
bass
and
drums,
playing
a
crescendo
over
the
six
bars
before
resting
on
a
Fmaj7#11
chord.
A
repetition
of
the
initial
guitar
introduction
seemed
appropriate
at
this
point,
but
in
order
not
to
present
the
same
material
in
exactly
the
same
fashion,
beat
four
was
removed
from
the
second
bar
of
the
phrase,
meaning
the
band
would
play
the
first
beat
of
the
solo
section
earlier
than
the
listener
would
expect.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
B
Section,
moving
into
the
first
solo
of
the
piece.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
22
–
Dip
–
B
Section
For
the
guitar
solo,
the
first
section
uses
the
chords
found
in
the
A
Section
melody,
with
the
simple
addition
of
a
D9#11
chord
to
provide
a
brief
change
of
colour
from
the
constant
major7#5
voicings.
The
next
section
of
the
solo
uses
chords
from
the
B
Section,
and
therefore
required
some
consideration
as
to
their
theoretical
makeup,
in
order
to
provide
information
for
the
soloist.
Rather
than
just
use
the
B
Section
in
it’s
entirety
for
the
solo,
what
seemed
to
be
more
effective
was
to
do
a
slight
variation
on
the
first
half
of
this
section,
turning
it
into
a
four
bar
phrase
rather
than
three,
partially
to
create
interest
for
the
listener,
but
also
to
alleviate
some
pressure
on
the
soloist,
as
the
chords
themselves
are
quite
complicated
without
having
to
consider
unusual
form
lengths
too.
The
above
chords
are
the
four
bar
sequence
that
were
chosen
as
a
variation
on
the
B
Section
to
play
during
the
guitar
solo.
After
the
guitar
solo
there
is
an
interlude,
which
shall
be
described
in
detail
later,
before
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo,
which
plays
over
the
same
chords
as
the
guitar
solo,
but
with
the
order
reversed,
the
piano
beginning
with
the
chromatically
moving
chords
based
on
the
B
section
melody,
then
moving
onto
the
chords
based
on
the
A
Section.
After
the
piano
solo
there
is
a
drum
feature
spread
over
a
twenty-‐two
bar
section.
The
musical
content
of
this
section
is
based
on
the
B
Section
of
the
melody,
using
the
same
chords
but
introducing
a
new,
extremely
simple
motif
on
the
keyboard.
The
section
begins
dynamically
low,
at
piano,
gradually
increasing
in
volume
as
the
keyboard’s
written
part
becomes
busier
in
tandem
with
the
drums.
For
the
end
of
the
section
the
B
section
melody
is
re-‐introduced
while
the
drums
continue
to
solo.
Everybody
ends
the
solo
with
an
Fmaj7#11
chord,
held
for
two
bars,
before
the
guitar
plays
the
phrase
from
the
introduction,
this
time
with
the
entire
band
catching
the
last
hit
of
the
motif.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
section
incorporating
the
drum
solo
and
end
of
the
piece.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
23
–
Dip
–
End
Section
3.3
–
Rehearsal
and
Adjustments
Rehearsal
of
this
piece
brought
about
a
dramatic
change
in
terms
of
the
instrumentation
as
the
original
line-‐up
was
to
include
cajón
and
tabla
rather
than
drum
set.
However,
upon
rehearing
the
piece
it
became
apparent
that
the
larger
orchestrational
palate
and
dynamic
capabilities
of
the
drum
set
would
be
more
beneficial
to
the
piece.
Also,
an
issue
that
I
hadn’t
considered
before
the
rehearsal
was
that
the
fact
that
the
tabla
is
a
pitched
instrument
created
an
issue
because
of
the
harmonic
density
of
the
piece.
The
fact
that
there
was
such
a
high
volume
of
chord
changes,
as
well
as
the
fact
none
of
these
chords
belonged
to
the
same
key
center
or
harmonic
universe,
meant
that
several
tabla
drums
would
have
to
be
set
up
to
keep
up
with
the
harmony.
This
was
problematic
because
it
meant
the
piece
was
quite
physically
uncomfortable
to
play
for
the
musician,
while
also
meaning
that
as
the
specific
drum
was
constantly
changing
to
accommodate
the
chords,
it
was
impossible
to
built
a
sense
of
continuity
within
the
tabla
part
itself.
The
constant
changing
of
the
pattern
and
tone
was
unfortunately
unavoidable,
quite
distracting,
and
not
in
keeping
with
what
was
intended
for
the
piece.
Also,
without
the
tabla,
the
cajón
did
not
have
the
ability
to
create
the
necessary
ethereal
atmosphere
required
for
the
B
Section
melody
and
interlude
between
solos.
After
listening
back
to
the
recording
it
was
quite
clear
that
a
drum
set
would
be
far
more
appropriate
to
the
piece.
3.
4
-‐
Collaborative
Advice
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
interlude
between
the
guitar
and
piano
solo
was
something
that
would
be
talked
about
later
in
the
paper.
The
reason
for
this
is
that
in
the
initial
writing
stages,
this
interlude
was
simply
a
repetition
of
the
B
Section
melody.
However,
upon
listening
to
the
rehearsal
recording,
Perico
suggested
that
perhaps
it
would
be
more
effective
to
compose
something
new
here
rather
than
just
repeat
previously
heard
material.
This
line
of
thought
is
very
much
in
keeping
with
what
I
usually
work
towards
in
a
composition
and
therefore
I
tended
to
agree
with
him.
The
intent
in
writing
this
section
was
to
create
something
new,
but
still
relevant
to
what
had
preceded
it.
To
achieve
this,
voicings
from
the
B
section
were
used,
but
with
a
different
harmonic
rhythm,
as
well
as
in
a
different
order.
The
process
for
choosing
what
chords,
and
what
order,
was
simply
done
through
trial
and
error,
mixing
and
matching
the
different
options
until
a
selection
was
found.
The
resulting
progression
was;
Melodically,
the
approach
was
similar
to
the
B
Section
of
the
piece,
using
a
repeated
rhythm
while
changing
the
melody
notes.
The
phrase
is
initially
played
by
the
keyboard
only,
before
being
joined
by
the
bass,
which
plays
the
same
figure.
In
the
case
the
rhythm
played
by
the
guitar
was
dictated
by
the
rhythm
of
the
melodic
figure,
the
chord
changing
to
match
the
melodic
note
on
the
second
eighth
note
of
beat
two.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
interlude
section.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
24
–
Dip
–
Interlude
3.5
–
Recording
The
recording
session
for
“Dip”
was
14.00-‐17.00,
on
the
9th
April
2014
at
the
Ann
Kreis
Scroing
Stage,
Berklee
Valencia.
The
engineer
for
the
session
was
Matthew
Mazzone,
and
the
band
consisted
of
Daniel
Toledo
on
electric
bass,
Ricardo
Curto
on
keyboards,
Mariano
Steimberg
on
drums,
as
well
as
myself
on
electric
guitar.
The
session
schedule
was
planned
to
be;
•
14.00-‐15.00
–
Setup.
•
15.00-‐16.30
–
Record
multiple
takes
of
piece.
•
16.30-‐17.00
–
Tear
down
equipment.
The
microphones
to
be
used
for
the
session
were
decided
in
advance
by
Matthew
and
I
and
consisted
of;
•
Guitar
–
SM57
+
Reyer
121
•
Bass
–
D.I.
•
Keyboards
–
D.I.
•
Drums
–
Kick
-‐
AKG
D112,
Snare
-‐
SM57,
Toms
-‐
Sennheiser
421
Overheads
–
KM
184
Due
to
time
constraints
and
the
decision
to
change
from
using
tabla
and
cajón
to
using
drumset,
the
recording
session
was
the
first
time
all
members
of
the
group
had
played
the
composition
together.
This
meant
that
the
first
couple
of
recorded
takes
of
the
piece
were
used
more
for
everyone
to
get
comfortable
with
their
parts
and
with
each.
This
situation
was
not
ideal
and
quite
stressful,
however,
the
playing
of
the
piece
came
together
quite
quickly
and
in
the
end
the
recording
was
deemed
a
success.
After
the
recording
session
on
the
Scoring
Stage,
I
decided
that
I
wanted
to
use
this
piece
as
an
opportunity
to
experiment
with
some
unusual
recording
techniques.
Studio
A
was
booked
for
a
recording
session,
and
in
this
session
several
guitar
takes
were
recorded
of
mostly
high
pitched
feedback
and
effect
pedal
laden,
non-‐diatonic
noise.
After
recording
all
these
different
sounds,
a
lot
of
time
was
spent
in
Pro
Tools,
cutting
different
segments
of
these
recordings
and
matching
them
together
to
create
atmospheric
sounds
to
complement
the
sparseness
of
the
B
Section
melody,
the
interlude,
to
add
to
the
tension
created
during
the
drum
solo,
and
also
the
very
last
note
of
the
piece.
This
technique
of
using
guitar
to
create
sounds
and
atmospheric
effects
not
usually
associated
with
the
instrument
is
an
influence
taken
very
much
from
the
music
of
Radiohead,
and
guitarist
Jeff
Beck.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
some
of
the
use
of
atmospheric
noise
in
the
track.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
25
–
Dip
–
Sound
Effects
3.6
–
Lessons
Learned
Making
a
conscious
decision
to
incorporate
information
from
my
private
lesson
to
a
composition
was
extremely
beneficial.
Deciding
to
use
melodic
minor
harmony
as
the
basis
for
the
main
melody
and
solo
section
meant
that
I
while
composing
and
practicing
the
piece,
I
was
also
preparing
myself
for
material
specific
to
my
lesson.
Aside
from
the
fact
that
this
had
the
benefit
of
aiding
the
progress
of
my
classwork,
it
also
meant
that
I
was
continually
challenging
myself
by
incorporating
what
was,
at
that
time,
unfamiliar
material
into
a
creation
that
was
my
own.
Thereby
increasing
the
sonic
range
of
what
usually
comes
naturally
to
me
as
a
composer.
Another
area
in
which
learning
was
achieved
during
this
process
was
in
the
field
of
recording
techniques.
As
the
session
for
overdubbing
the
guitar
effects
was
after
the
main
session
on
the
scoring
stage,
I
engineered
the
overdubs
myself.
This
put
me
in
the
position
of
having
complete
control
over
the
recording
techniques
employed,
and
forced
me
to
confront
some
areas
of
my
expertise
which
were
weak.
Increasing
skill
levels
in
this
area
will
be
extremely
advantageous
for
the
future
as
it
will
enable
me
to
both
record
myself,
and
also
increase
my
understanding
of
what
engineers
do,
with
the
additional
benefit
of
being
better
able
to
articulate
my
needs
in
recording
situations.
Connecting
the
Compositions
1.1–
Musical
Connections
While
writing
and
recording
the
above
pieces,
there
were
some
aspects
of
the
compositions
that
were
approached
similarly
during
each.
During
the
above
analysis
it
was
regularly
demonstrated
that
there
was
intent
to
never
repeat
the
same
material
in
exactly
the
same
way.
If
a
section
was
to
be
repeated,
methods
of
achieving
this
included;
changing
the
instrument
playing
the
melody,
adding
an
instrument
to
double
the
melody
or
repeated
part,
starting
the
repeated
part
from
somewhere
other
than
what
was
previously
the
beginning,
changing
the
role
of
an
instrument
from
melody
to
harmony
or
vice
versa.
The
intent
behind
this
was
to
keep
the
attention
of
the
listener
by
circumventing
their
expectations,
and
is
keeping
with
the
initial
aspiration
of
engaging
an
audience
with
influences
of
pop/rock/funk
music
in
mind.
Another
method
employed
in
the
construction
of
each
composition
was
the
reversal
of
the
solo
forms.
In
each
case,
no
instrument
solos
over
exactly
the
same
form,
it
was
always
a
reversal
of
the
structure
the
previous
instrument
had
used
to
solo
over.
This
was
as
a
result
of
always
including
a
written
section
between
the
solos,
usually
based
on
a
section
of
the
melody,
thereby
allowing
the
next
solo
form
to
begin
from
the
subsequent
section
of
the
melody
while
still
maintaining
aural
cohesion.
The
use
of
pentatonics
for
constructing
melodies
was
also
an
element
connecting
each
composition,
particularly
the
combination
of
minor
pentatonic
scales
played
beginning
from
the
major
7th
of
a
major
chord.
This
chord/scale
combination
results
in
the
inclusion
of
a
#11,
which
creates
an
open,
Lydian
sound
while
still
retaining
the
accessible
melodicism
of
a
minor
pentatonic
scale.
This
approach
for
creating
melodies
is
an
influence
directly
taken
from
the
music
of
Wayne
Shorter,
particularly
the
albums,
“Juju”,
and
“Speak
No
Evil”.
Another
method
that
was
employed
in
each
composition
was
the
use
of
a
top
note
connecting
a
series
of
quite
harmonically
complex
chords.
As
mentioned
previously
many
of
the
more
unusual
chord
structures
took
their
influence
from
the
music
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel.
The
use
of
slash
chords
with
unusual
tensions,
b9
played
on
major
chords
etc,
needed
to
be
offset
by
the
coherence
of
keeping
a
constant
element
throughout,
the
use
of
a
static
top
note
throughout
complex
harmonic
movement
was
extremely
effective
in
each
case
and
therefore
was
employed
each
time
this
situation
arose.
As
well
as
keeping
static
notes
on
top
of
moving
harmony,
another
technique
employed
in
each
composition
that
takes
it’s
influence
from
the
music
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel,
is
the
use
of
chromatic
bass
movement.
This
is
an
excellent
technique
for
any
situation
where
the
creation
of
tension
is
required
and
was
used
extensively
in
each
composition.
Although
there
were
many
elements
that
were
consciously
chosen
as
compositional
techniques
prior
to
the
writing
of
each
piece,
there
were
also
some
that
were
not
previously
planned,
but
became
apparent
after
the
analysis.
One
very
obvious
example
of
this
was
the
fact
that
in
each
piece
the
A
section
provides
the
main
melodic
content,
while
the
B
section
melody
is
closer
to
an
ostinato
than
an
actual
melody
per
se.
This
is
demonstrable
in
all
three
of
the
pieces
analysed
here,
and
while
it
was
not
a
technique
that
had
been
consciously
adapted,
it
was
extremely
effective
in
each
piece
and
something
that
will
certainly
be
consciously
explored,
put
into
use,
and
adapted
for
future
compositions.
A
non-‐compositional
element
that
connects
each
of
these
pieces
is
the
sound
of
the
electric
guitar.
This
is
something
that
was
consciously
worked
on
and
tweaked
before
each
recording.
The
equipment
used
to
achieve
the
sound
for
the
chordal,
or
non-‐lead,
parts
is
an
MXR
Distrtion+
pedal,
combined
with
a
Boss
DD6
Digital
delay.
The
lead
sound
again
used
the
Boss
DD6,
this
time
combined
with
a
RAT
distortion
and
occasionally
a
Digitech
Whammy
pedal.
A
Fender
Hot
Rod
Deluxe
was
the
amplifier
used
in
each
case.
While
not
a
compositional
element
itself,
the
guitar
sound
is
almost
the
most
important
aspect
of
their
connection.
The
sound
of
the
instrument
is
the
voice
of
the
composer
and
should
be
recognisable
and
distinctive
throughout.
2.1
–
Aspirations
achieved?
As
mentioned
at
the
beginning
of
the
text,
there
were
a
number
of
aspirations
for
these
compositions
prior
to
actually
writing
them,
including
creating
a
listenability
and
melodic
accessibility
in
keeping
with
influences
from
the
pop/rock/funk
world,
while
still
incorporating
the
improvisational
elements
of
jazz
music.
As
the
composer
and
performer
of
these
pieces
it
is
difficult
to
be
objective
in
judging
whether
or
not
these
aspirations
were
achieved.
However,
after
repeated
listening
it
does
seem
that
each
track
has
enough
elements
associated
with
other
forms
of
music
to
hold
the
attention
of
listeners
that
are
not
fans
of
jazz.
These
elements
include
many
of
the
compositional
approaches
previously
spoken
of,
as
well
as
an
overall
sound
that
has
more
in
common
with
rock
music
than
jazz.
One
aspect
of
the
pieces
that
may
not
fit
with
the
intended
aesthetic
is
the
length
of
the
compositions
themselves.
The
shortest
track
is
just
under
five
minutes,
the
longest
is
closer
to
eight.
While
this
is
not
in
keeping
with
the
influence
of
contemporary
popular
music,
it
may
not
necessarily
be
considered
a
negative
outcome.
It
seems
that
while
it
is
important
to
consider
the
listener
in
these
cases,
it
is
also
important
to
allow
the
musicians
time
and
opportunity
to
express
themselves
during
solos.
Also,
an
awareness
of
keeping
the
potential
reach
of
the
piece
as
strong
as
possible
should
not
be
executed
at
the
expense
of
the
musical
quality.
While
all
the
elements
stated
in
this
paper
were
considered
while
writing
each
piece,
the
deciding
factor
was
always
the
musical
quality.
If
a
section
seemed
like
it
needed
to
be
long,
or
if
unusual,
dissonant
harmony
was
the
most
effective
option,
this
was
the
option
that
was
chosen.
Whether
or
not
this
approach
was
the
correct
one
will
become
more
apparent
once
the
EP
is
released,
and
direct
feedback
can
be
received
from
listeners
and
colleagues.
Final
Conclusions
1.1
–
Lessons
Learned
During
the
process
of
writing
and
recording
these
pieces
my
knowledge
increased
in
numerous
areas,
all
of
which
have
been
previously
discussed
in
the
conclusion
of
each
chapter.
The
areas
in
which
I
have
learned
extensively
included;
chord/scale
relationships,
different
approaches
to
beginning
a
composition,
recording
techniques,
time
management
with
regards
the
writing
and
arrangement
of
charts,
etc.
However,
the
most
valuable
lesson
I
gained
from
this
experience
was
the
realisation
of
how
important
writing,
composing,
and
performing
my
own
work
is
to
me.
Having
previously
spent
many
years
working
as
a
sideman,
as
well
as
working
as
a
collaborative
writer
in
band
situations,
it
had
been
several
years
since
I
had
the
time
to
work
on
material
that
was
entirely
self-‐composed.
The
realisation
of
how
much
I
enjoy
the
process
and
satisfaction
of
this
work
has
been
a
revelation,
and
means
I
will
ensure
to
prioritise
this
in
the
future.
As
mentioned
earlier
in
this
document,
the
ability
to
combine
a
working
life
that
incorporates
both
the
playing
of
other
people’s
material
as
well
as
my
own
will
ensure
that
I
stay
challenged
and
engaged
as
a
professional
musician.
Also,
time
spent
working
on
my
own
compositions
is
invaluable
to
the
expedient
growth
of
my
own
voice
as
an
instrumentalist.
While
this
is
enormously
beneficial
to
me
in
terms
of
nurturing
my
growth
as
a
composer,
it
also
has
the
added
benefit
of
making
my
approach
to
the
composed
music
of
others
more
recognisably
my
own,
which
may
make
it
easier
to
find
work
as
a
sideman
if
potential
employers
wish
to
have
this
particular
sound
on
their
recorded
work.
Another
element
that
changed
as
a
result
of
working
on
these
pieces
was
the
realisation
of
how
important
it
is
to
incorporate
as
many
disciplines
as
possible
into
your
practice
routine.
This
came
about
mostly
because
of
using
elements
from
my
private
lesson
in
the
compositions,
which
made
me
realise
the
time-‐saving
and
accelerated
learning
benefits
of
this
technique.
Doing
this
meant
that
I
was
incorporating
sounds
that
were
new
to
me
into
my
compositions,
as
well
as
working
on
soloing
over
this
new
material,
all
while
working
on
getting
a
composition
written.
I
noticed
the
speed
at
which
I
became
familiar
with
new
material
greatly
increased
when
I
used
it
in
a
composition
rather
than
just
practicing
separately
from
the
writing
process,
and
this
is
definitely
a
new
aspect
to
my
practicing
technique
that
I
will
continue
to
employ
in
the
future.
1.2
–
Planning
Ahead
The
next
step
for
my
original
music
is
to
make
it
available
to
the
public.
As
I
have
signed
as
an
artist
to
Disrupción
Records,
the
Berklee
Valencia
record
label,
this
means
I
will
have
substantial
help
with
this
process.
The
plan
is
to
have
a
digital
release
of
the
EP
on
many
platforms
in
summer
2014,
the
label
will
help
in
terms
of
marketing,
promotion,
artwork,
etc.,
and
discussions
and
meetings
regarding
this
process
are
ongoing.
Upon
completing
the
Contemporary
Performance
program
at
Berklee
Valencia,
I
will
be
embarking
on
a
tour
of
the
west
coast
of
the
United
States,
followed
by
other
short
tours
in
Scotland,
Ireland,
Italy,
and
Spain,
this
time
working
as
a
sideman.
Following
the
completion
of
these
travels
I
will
be
scheduling
a
physical
release
of
an
album
version
of
the
EP
in
November
2014,
in
Dublin,
Ireland.
Following
the
physical
release
of
this
album,
booking
agents
for
festivals
in
every
possible
area
of
the
globe
will
be
approached
with
a
view
to
securing
dates
for
summer
2015.
During
this
time
I
will
be
working
as
a
sideman
in
various
projects
mostly
based
in
Ireland,
while
also
beginning
work
on
composing
for
the
follow
up
to
the
EP.
Link
to
free
download
of
EP;
•
http://stephenmchale.bandcamp.com/releases
McHale
Master
of
Music
Candidate,
Contemporary
Performance,
Berklee
College
of
Music
–
Valencia
Campus
Culminating
Experience
Final
Paper
Soundcloud
Playlist
for
Musical
Examples
–
https://soundcloud.com/mchalestephen/sets/ce-‐soundcloud
1
–
INTRODUCTION
1.1
–
Musical
Beginnings
My
name
is
Stephen
McHale,
I
am
a
guitarist
and
composer
from
Ireland.
I
have
previously
studied
for
a
National
Diploma
in
Popular
Music
at
Ballyfermot
College
of
Further
Education,
receiving
a
Distinction
grade,
as
well
as
a
Bachelor
of
Arts
in
Jazz
Performance
from
Newpark
Music
Centre,
where
I
graduated
with
First
Class
Honours.
Despite
having
spent
four
years
studying
for
a
degree
in
Jazz
Performance,
and
therefore
having
the
bulk
of
my
practice
and
learning
time
for
many
years
devoted
to
jazz,
I
still
feel
a
disconnect
from
jazz
music
as
it
was
something
I
came
to
later
in
my
development
as
a
musician.
The
sounds
that
initially
piqued
my
musical
interests
are
the
contemporary
music
of
my
younger
years,
as
well
as
the
older
rock
and
pop
music
that
was
played
in
my
house
growing
up.
The
explosion
of
Britpop
when
I
was
very
young
was
the
starting
point
for
the
development
of
my
interest
in
music,
as
I
obsessively
listened
to
the
bands
of
the
time,
Oasis,
Blur,
Pulp,
The
Stone
Roses,
and
then
sought
out
all
the
influences
they
spoke
of
in
interviews,
Led
Zeppelin,
The
Beatles,
Jimi
Hendrix,
etc.
This
process
of
searching
through
older
recordings
continued
and
eventually
led
me
to
the
jazz
fusion
styles
of
The
Mahavishnu
Orchestra,
Jeff
Beck,
Weather
Report,
Jaco
Pastorius,
etc.
It
wasn’t
until
I
began
my
Bachelor
in
Jazz
Performance
that
I
really
began
to
listen
to
the
older
jazz
masters,
Miles
Davis,
Wes
Montgomery,
Thelonious
Monk,
Wayne
Shorter.
The
result
of
growing
up
in
an
environment
where
music
was
ubiquitous,
as
many
members
of
my
family
work
in
the
Irish
music
industry,
as
well
as
having
studied
music
in
the
popular
and
jazz
idioms,
coupled
with
the
fact
I
have
a
personal
interest
in
a
very
broad
range
of
musical
styles,
has
meant
that
I
have
found
myself
working
professionally
as
a
sideman
in
a
broad
variety
of
genres,
having
to
be
competent,
knowledgeable,
and
comfortable
in
all
of
these
scenarios.
1.2
–
Focused
Eclecticism
Since
arriving
in
Valencia,
I
have
fully
realised
the
benefit
of
these
experiences,
as
it
has
meant
I
have
been
able
to
continue
broadening
my
musical
horizons
while
also
delighting
in
the
fact
that
I
can
partake
in
a
huge
volume
of
performances/recordings
with
a
varied
collection
of
my
classmates
and
professors.
The
continuous
flow
of
visiting
artists
to
Berklee
Valencia
has
also
been
enlightening
in
terms
of
this
project,
the
knowledge
that
versatility
creates
more
opportunities
for
me
to
play
with,
and
as
a
consequence,
learn
from,
the
visiting
artists
drives
me
to
work
harder
at
ensuring
I
can
fit
into
as
many
musical
scenarios
as
possible.
Of
course
this
approach
will
have
the
knock-‐on
effect
of
developing
my
professional
skills
with
a
view
to
a
successful
life
as
a
musician
once
my
time
at
Berklee
Valencia
has
ended.
While
I
have
benefitted
from
and
enjoyed
these
opportunities
enormously,
I
have
also
come
to
realise
the
importance
of
performing
and
recording
my
own
compositions,
in
terms
of
finding
my
own
voice
as
an
instrumentalist,
the
continuation
of
the
development
of
my
own
particular
style,
as
well
as
maintaining
a
working
life
as
an
original
artist,
so
that
I
may
enjoy
the
benefits
of
being
in
a
position
to
perform
the
music
of
other
people,
as
well
as
working
on
my
own
material,
while
being
musically
challenged
in
a
varied
enough
fashion
that
I
don’t
grow
jaded
with
either.
2
–
PROJECT
2.1
-‐
Project
In
this
sense,
there
is
a
conflict
between
the
music
that
I
first
loved
and
the
music
I
study.
This
is
a
common
theme
among
contemporary
jazz
musicians,
as
unlike
the
masters
of
the
genre
which
we
study,
i.e.,
Charlie
Parker,
John
Coltrane,
Herbie
Hancock,
etc.,
most
of
us
did
not
grow
up
with
jazz
music
as
a
regular
fixture
in
our
lives,
it
was
something
we
were
exposed
to
after
years
spent
learning
to
play
the
music
that
surrounded
us
in
our
early
years,
be
it
rock,
pop,
funk,
hip-‐hop,
blues,
and
so
on.
My
intention
for
this
project
is
to
compose,
record,
and
release
an
EP
of
original
compositions
that
combine
my
initial
musical
influences
with
the
music
I
have
been
studying
both
as
a
student
at
Berklee
Valencia
and
at
my
previous
educational
institutes.
This
will
be
combined
with
a
written
document
to
analyse
and
justify
the
reasons
for
working
towards
this
goal,
also
containing
an
analysis
of
the
compositions
themselves.
2.2
–
Compositonal
Process
The
compositional
process
I
employed
in
the
writing
of
the
material
for
this
EP
varied
slightly
from
piece
to
piece,
and
the
method
shall
be
gone
into
in
more
depth
later
in
this
document,
but
the
general
system
remained
the
same
each
time.
I
would
specifically
set
aside
a
time
slot
several
days
in
advance
of
when
I
planned
to
compose,
this
would
mean
that
I
would
have
time
to
think
about
what
my
intention
was
going
to
be
for
the
piece,
I
could
listen
to
music
and
consider
whether
or
not
there
would
be
a
particular
piece
of
music,
or
many
different
pieces,
that
were
going
to
influence
this
composition.
I
would
also
make
short
recordings
of
any
ideas
that
came
to
me
in
the
days
leading
up
to
my
composition
time.
This
mental
and
musical
preparation
with
composition
in
mind
meant
that
I
never
had
to
approach
a
blank
page
and
begin
to
write
without
any
direction
or
guidance,
it
made
the
process
quicker
and
helped
me
hit
the
ground
running
each
time.
Once
I
had
composed
all
the
parts
for
the
members
of
the
band
and
entered
them
to
Finale,
I
would
organise
a
rehearsal
and
play
what
I
had
written
with
the
musicians
in
my
group.
Invariably,
the
first
playing
of
the
piece
would
bring
issues
to
my
attention,
especially
in
terms
of
the
length
of
sections,
orchestration,
and
dynamics.
I
would
decide
on
these
changes
in
the
rehearsal,
make
the
adjustments
to
the
musicians’
parts,
and
then
hope
that
by
the
end
I
would
have
an
arrangement
that
was
effective.
After
making
a
recording
of
this
arrangement,
using
either
my
iPhone
or
MBox,
I
would
bring
the
recording
to
Perico
Sambeat
during
his
scheduled
office
hours,
play
the
composition
for
him
and
ask
for
his
opinion
on
all
aspects
of
the
piece.
Perico
is
a
compositional
master,
particularly
of
the
contemporary
jazz
genre,
and
his
observations
and
comments
were
invaluable
in
terms
of
working
to
ensure
the
composition
be
of
the
highest
quality
possible.
I
would
take
notes
at
these
sessions
and
then,
if
necessary,
make
changes
to
the
arrangement
and
send
the
finished
parts
to
the
musicians
before
what
would
usually
be
a
second
rehearsal,
but
occasionally,
due
to
time
constraints
and
lack
of
availability,
would
be
a
recording
session.
Due
to
the
fact
that
many
of
my
compositions
take
their
roots
from
a
wide
variety
of
musical
influences,
the
harmony
employed
could
occasionally
be
an
extreme
departure
from
the
style
of
chordal
progressions
I
am
familiar
with
soloing
over.
For
this
reason
I
would
use
my
private
lesson
with
Israel
Sandoval
to
ask
for
advice
on
how
to
approach
soloing
over
the
more
unusual
chords
and
chord
changes.
This
led
to
an
accumulation
of
knowledge
regarding
artificial
scales,
and
soloing
with
an
approach
that
incorporated
some
elements
of
traditional
jazz
(bebop
scales
etc.),
as
well
as
the
more
unusual
sounds
and
theory
of
the
artificially
constructed
scales,
limited
transposition
scales,
etc.
This
information
helped
me
hugely
as
it
provided
me
with
a
new
arsenal
of
sounds
in
my
improvisational
repertoire,
as
well
as
helping
me
to
be
comfortable
when
asked
to
solo
over
more
complex
harmony.
2.3
–
Compositional
Aspirations
The
aspirations
I
have
in
terms
of
these
compositions
are
to
maintain
the
listenability
and
occasionally
simplistic
melodicism
of
contemporary
popular
music,
while
also
incorporating
the
improvisational
jazz
elements
that
provide
an
opportunity
for
me
to
showcase
the
skills
I
have
been
working
on
for
the
past
number
of
years,
and
particularly
the
skills
I
have
learned
during
my
time
at
Berklee
Valencia.
In
order
to
create
this
style
of
composition,
I
will
sometimes
specifically
reference
material
from
some
of
the
contemporary
composers
that
have
influenced
me,
using
stylistically
similar
chord
progressions
and
guitar
sounds,
while
also
allowing
the
information
I
have
learned
while
studying
jazz
to
be
prominent
throughout,
all
the
time
striving
to
ensure
the
influence
of
non-‐jazz
and
jazz
music
remain
noticeable
throughout.
2.3
–Why
This
Approach?
As
previously
mentioned,
the
idea
of
having
a
conflict
between
the
music
that
initially
sparked
our
interest
and
the
music
we
study
is
a
common
theme
among
contemporary
jazz
performers.
One
way
in
which
this
can
be
demonstrated
is
by
the
large
number
of
successful
contemporary
jazz
composers
that
include
their
own
arrangements
of
rock/pop/electronic
music
in
their
releases.
Some
examples
of
jazz
musicians
of
today
covering
other
artists
include;
•
Robert
Glasper
–
Smells
Like
Teen
Spirit
(Nirvana)
•
The
Bad
Plus
–
Flim
(Aphex
Twin)
•
Brad
Mehldau
–
Paranoid
Android
(Radiohead)
•
Christian
Scott
–
The
Eraser
(Thom
Yorke)
•
Vijay
Iyer
–
MmmHmm
(Flying
Lotus)
•
Dave
Douglas
–
Unison
(Bjork)
Similarly
to
me,
I
believe
these
artists
have
a
desire
to
explore
contemporary
music
they
enjoy
and
can
relate
to,
while
also
using
these
familiar
melodies
and
chord
progressions
as
a
vehicle
for
demonstrating
their
improvisational
abilities.
There
is
also
a
recognition
and
respect
from
these
artists
for
the
difficult
nature
of
writing
high
quality,
yet
accessible
music.
The
difference
is
that
I
plan
to
keep
this
ideal
prominent
but
through
original
compositions.
Another
reason
this
approach
to
composing
and
performing
contemporary
jazz
music
appeals
to
people
is
that
it
creates
the
possibility
for
a
wider
audience.
The
general
public
can
easily
be
turned
off
by
the
prospect
of
listening
to
(and
especially
paying
for)
jazz
music,
as
the
typical
association
is
with
dense,
complicated
harmony
and
melody,
combined
with
long
solos
that
can
be
difficult
to
comprehend
without
some
kind
of
musical
training.
Writing
and
performing
with
more
accessibility
in
mind,
while
still
maintaining
artistic
integrity,
is
beneficial
for
everyone
as
the
combination
of
high
level
musicianship
with
more
easy
to
digest
chords
and
melodies,
will
create
the
likelihood
of
a
wider
interest
in
live
performance
of
the
music,
as
well
as
more
potential
for
sales/downloads
of
the
EP.
2.4
-‐
Expected
Outcomes
The
main
expected
outcome
from
this
project
is
to
develop
my
skills
and
knowledge
as
a
composer,
as
well
as
become
more
aware
of
what
it
is
that
appeals
to
me
as
a
writer,
and
the
most
effective
ways
to
impart
my
musical
tastes
into
a
body
of
work
that
can
have
all
the
qualities
I
previously
spoke
of,
artistic
integrity,
musical
accessibility,
and
a
successful
combination
of
the
improvisational
elements
of
jazz
with
the
influences
of
other
musical
genres.
A
second
outcome
from
this
project
is
to
have
an
EP
that
will
be
available
for
release
before
the
end
of
the
summer
2014
semester
at
Berklee
Valencia.
This
proposed
outcome
has
been
aided
enormously
by
the
fact
that
I
was
signed
as
an
artist
by
Disrupción
Records,
the
student-‐run,
Berklee
Valencia
record
label.
This
development
means
that
I
will
have
a
team
of
people
to
help
with
choosing
platforms
to
release
the
EP,
as
well
as
in
promotion,
artwork,
and
creating
as
much
interest
in
the
project
as
is
possible.
Compositional
Analysis
1
–
“Lark”
1.1
–
Initial
Intention
For
this
piece,
my
presence
at
Berklee
Valencia
was
a
huge
factor
in
influencing
my
compositional
process.
The
diversity
of
the
student
body
at
this
campus
means
that
musical
traditions
and
influences
are
plentiful
and
wide-‐ranging.
Many
of
the
students
here
display
the
influences
of
the
traditional
music
of
their
country
quite
prominently
in
their
work,
or
at
least
have
a
strong
awareness
and
knowledge
of
these
musical
roots.
Despite
the
fact
that
members
of
my
family
work
specifically
with
traditional
Irish
music,
and
the
fact
that
I
grew
up
in
an
area
where
live
traditional
Irish
music
can
be
heard
in
many
venues
on
a
daily
basis,
I
have
rarely,
in
fact
almost
never,
played
traditional
Irish
music
and
only
possess
the
most
basic
knowledge
of
the
genre.
While
studying
at
Berklee
Valencia,
my
fellow
students
made
me
feel
like
I
should
make
an
effort
to
be
much
more
aware
of
the
musical
heritage
of
my
country,
and
therefore,
for
this
composition
I
decided
I
would
search
for
some
elements
of
traditional
Irish
music
that
I
could
incorporate
into
my
own
compositions,
both
in
order
to
provide
myself
with
a
fresh
approach
to
composing,
as
well
as
increasing
my
own
knowledge
of
the
genre.
1.2
-‐
Search
and
Solidification
of
Ideas
Once
the
decision
was
made
to
incorporate
traditional
Irish
melodies
with
this
composition,
specific
recordings
were
chosen
as
a
starting
point.
I
listened
to
albums
by
“The
Bothy
Band”,
as
well
as
“Planxty”,
and
many
other
classic
recordings
of
Irish
traditional
music.
While
these
recordings
were
exquisite
in
terms
of
their
music,
I
found
it
difficult
to
translate
the
information
into
something
I
could
use
in
one
of
my
own
compositions.
Because
of
this
I
chose
to
delve
into
a
slightly
more
modern
sound
and
began
listening
to,
and
transcribing
sections
of,
an
album
titled
“The
Storm”
by
Irish
traditional/fusion
band
“Moving
Hearts”.
I
instantly
found
that
while
melodically,
the
information
was
sometimes
the
exact
same
as
in
the
previous
recordings
I
had
listened
to,
I
felt
more
connected
to
the
music,
most
likely
because
the
instrumentation
is
closer
to
what
I
intended
to
use,
ie
electric
instruments,
drum
set,
etc.,
but
possibly
also
because
I
have
a
personal
connection
to
the
group
as
one
of
my
former
teachers
is
the
drummer.
I
was
instantly
astounded
at
the
melodic
wealth
on
offer
in
these
recordings,
as
I
often
struggle
to
write
clear,
concise,
and
catchy
melodies,
to
be
confronted
with
this
constantly
changing
yet
memorable
melodic
style
made
quite
an
impression
on
me.
Also,
the
fact
that
they
achieve
a
high
level
of
sophistication
with
their
melodies
while
never
straying
from
diatonic
notes
played
over
very
simple
harmony
was
a
lesson
to
me
in
the
fact
that
complexity
is
not
necessary
to
create
interest.
Here
are
some
short
examples
of
melodic
ideas
contained
within
one
track.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
Track
1
Lark
–
Melodic
Wealth
Because
of
the
enormous
volume
of
material
on
offer
in
this
recording,
it
was
apparent
that
the
scope
would
have
to
be
narrowed
to
just
focusing
on
one
track,
and
even
then
on
a
very
small
portion
of
this
one
track.
The
composition
that
seemed
most
suitable
is
titled
“The
Lark”,
the
first
track
taken
from
the
album
“The
Storm”.
1.3
–
The
Writing
Process
As
previously
stated
I
decided
that
in
order
to
begin
composing
with
the
influence
of
this
track
in
mind,
I
would
need
to
focus
on
a
very
small
amount
of
the
information
contained
within
it.
The
process
of
choosing
which
parts
to
use
was
quite
simple,
two
very
small
melodic
ideas
that
had
a
very
strong
appeal
on
first
listen
were
chosen,
and
working
with
these
ideas
in
order
to
create
an
A
and
B
section
melody
for
the
piece
was
the
beginning
process
of
the
composition.
Here
are
the
two
melodic
ideas
chosen
as
the
starting
point
for
the
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
Track
2
Lark
–
Original
A
and
B
Section
After
transcribing
and
then
playing
the
first
example
a
few
times
on
my
instrument,
I
stopped
playing
the
melody
exactly
as
it
was
on
the
recording
and
let
myself
play
it
in
a
manner
that
felt
more
natural.
I
then
recorded
myself
playing
this
new
version
of
the
melody
and
transcribed
what
I
was
playing.
The
result
was
that
there
was
a
time
signature
change
from
4/4
to
5/4
in
bar
two
of
the
melody,
and
also
some
notes
were
removed
from
the
end
of
the
original
motif
because
it
seemed
that
playing
the
motif
in
it’s
entirety
sounded
too
specifically
like
Irish
traditional
music
and
was
too
far
a
departure
from
the
contemporary
jazz
style
that
was
desired.
As
well
as
this,
the
tempo
was
reduced
to
make
the
melody
more
playable
and
also
let
the
tension
be
created
by
the
chord/melody
combination,
as
well
as
the
stop-‐time
hits,
rather
than
by
the
high
tempo
of
the
composition.
On
listening
to
the
original
track
I
noticed
that
there
was
a
section
where
this
melody
was
played
with
stop-‐time
hits,
and
decided
that
using
this
idea
might
be
a
very
effective
way
to
create
interesting
parts
for
the
band
to
perform
while
the
melody
was
being
played.
In
order
to
decide
which
chords
to
use,
effective
moments
to
place
the
hits
were
chosen,
then
different
chord
voicings
were
tried,
placing
the
melody
note
on
top.
Aside
from
the
first
hit
on
beat
one
of
the
first
bar,
all
the
hits
are
placed
on
the
last
note
of
each
short
melodic
phrase.
The
chords
that
were
most
effective
to
be
placed
on
these
hits
were
Lydian
and
Altered
voicings,
as
these
choices
kept
the
contemporary
jazz
feel
prominent,
even
though
the
melody
itself
was
quite
simple.
In
order
to
move
from
the
A
section
to
the
B,
the
melody
needed
some
kind
of
tag,
or
repeated
figure,
to
make
it
seem
more
obviously
like
the
end
of
a
phrase.
It
seemed
the
best
way
to
do
this
would
be
to
sequence
the
last
small
motif
of
the
melodic
phrase
and
then
repeat
it
down
a
tone,
before
repeating
it
down
a
tone
again,
finishing
with
a
rest
of
six
beats
before
changing
to
the
B
section.
The
rest
lasting
six
beats
was
again
decided
by
listening
back
to
a
recording
of
myself
playing
the
change
between
the
sections,
playing
what
came
naturally
and
then
writing
it
down
after
the
fact.
Again,
Lydian
chords
were
the
most
effective
for
each
hit
as
they
gave
me
the
modern,
open
feel
appropriate
to
the
piece.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
that
contains
the
melodic
idea
from
the
original
recording,
followed
by
the
A
section
of
my
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
Track
3
Lark
–
A
Section
Melody
For
the
B
section
of
the
piece,
the
original
melody
was
used
almost
exactly
as
on
the
original
recording,
the
only
difference
being
that
the
original
phrase
is
four
bars
long,
whereas
in
the
composition
only
the
first
two
bars
of
the
melody
are
repeated
rather
than
playing
the
third
and
fourth
bars,
thereby
creating
an
effect
closer
to
an
ostinato
than
what
would
be
strictly
considered
a
melody.
The
reason
this
was
done
was
that
the
two
bar
phrase
was
powerful
enough
by
itself
to
warrant
being
repeated
without
variation.
To
complement
this
it
seemed
a
rising
chromatic
chord
sequence
played
underneath
it
would
add
to
the
drama
and
tension.
This
technique
of
combining
a
simple
melodic
idea
with
a
chromatically
moving
chord
sequence
is
something
used
to
great
effect
by
Kurt
Rosenwinkel,
particularly
on
his
composition
“Zhivago”.
Similarly
to
Kurt’s
approach,
in
this
case
the
voicing
is
kept
the
same
and
the
bass
note
ascends
chromatically,
and
due
to
the
repetition
of
notes
within
each
chord,
the
sound
remains
aurally
cohesive.
Because
this
type
of
approach
is
very
guitar
driven
the
melody
was
switched
to
the
piano,
which
also
helped
create
a
new
atmosphere
for
the
new
section.
A
crescendo
spread
over
the
course
of
the
entire
B
section
seemed
an
effective
method
to
capture
the
repetitive,
cyclic
feel
of
this
melody,
while
also
maintaining
the
interest
of
the
audience.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
original
melody,
followed
by
an
excerpt
of
the
B
section
from
my
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
track
4
–
Lark
–
B
Section
Melody
After
the
B
Section
the
piece
returns
back
to
a
shortened
version
of
the
A
Section,
this
time
playing
the
same
melody
but
going
straight
to
the
second
time
ending.
The
melody
is
written
for
the
piano
part
to
add
some
extra
force
and
also
create
a
different
texture
to
the
first
A
section,
as
the
audience
has
already
heard
this
material.
From
here
there
is
a
transition
to
the
first
solo,
and
in
order
to
create
an
interesting
transition
to
the
solo
form,
the
first
note
of
the
solo
is
the
last
note
in
the
melodic
sequence
the
audience
had
previously
heard.
This
is
an
effective
way
of
showing
the
same,
or
at
least
similar,
information
while
also
surprising
the
listener
with
a
new
development.
As
there
had
been
a
lot
of
tension
built
in
each
section
of
the
composition
so
far,
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo
needed
a
slightly
more
relaxed
feel
than
the
previous
sections.
The
method
for
achieving
this
was
to
begin
the
solo
with
the
same
chords
as
the
B
section
but
this
time,
play
each
chord
for
an
entire
bar,
rather
than
just
two
beats.
This
achieved
the
necessary
effect
of
having
more
space,
while
still
retaining
the
mood
created
in
the
previous
sections.
The
next
section
of
the
solo
then
repeats
the
same
chords,
but
this
time
just
for
two
beats
each.
After
this
the
solo
form
then
changes
to
chords
based
on
the
A
section,
before
returning
to
the
chromatically
moving
chords,
this
time
transposed
a
minor
3rd
up
from
where
they
originally
were,
once
again
with
the
intention
presenting
similar
information
from
a
new
angle
in
order
to
maintain
the
listener’s
interest.
This
desire
to
keep
the
listener’s
focus,
through
transposition
and
compositional
surprises,
is
something
that
I
was
very
aware
of
in
terms
of
my
initial
intention
of
keeping
the
contemporary
jazz
feel
of
the
piece
while
still
having
the
listenability
of
which
I
spoke
earlier.
To
end
the
guitar
solo
there
is
the
subtle
introduction
of
a
short
melodic
idea,
played
just
once
by
the
guitar,
then
repeated
by
the
piano
as
part
of
the
accompaniment.
This
melodic
phrase
is
then
played
very
loudly,
and
powerfully,
by
the
entire
band
before
everyone
dropping
out
abruptly
to
begin
the
piano
solo.
The
piano
solo
begins
with
the
piano
playing
this
melodic
phrase
alone,
before
then
playing
over
a
variation
on
the
A
section
chord
sequence.
I
purposely
wrote
this
as
part
of
the
arrangement
as
I
knew
the
part
was
going
to
be
played
by
Piotr
Orzechowski,
a
pianist
that
has
a
huge
amount
of
experience
and
skill
in
the
discipline
of
solo
piano.
After
sixteen
bars
the
band
re-‐enters.
The
final
section
of
the
piano
solo
is
played
over
the
B
section
chords,
with
the
guitar
playing
the
B
section
melody
while
the
piano
continues
to
solo.
This
again
is
a
repetition
of
previously
heard
material
but
in
a
different
context;
melody
that
was
previously
played
by
piano
is
now
played
by
guitar.
Similarly
to
the
end
of
the
guitar
solo,
piano
solo
ends
with
the
entire
band
playing
a
melodic
motif
with
a
crescendo.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
containing
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo,
transition
to
the
piano
solo,
and
ending
of
the
piano
solo.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
5
–
Solo
Transitions
After
the
piano
solo
there
is
an
entirely
new
section
that
ends
the
composition.
For
the
section
I
very
much
displayed
the
influence
of
rock
music
on
my
compositional
approach,
the
hits
played
by
piano
and
drums
take
their
influence
from
the
Led
Zeppelin
composition
“Immigrant
Song”,
while
the
guitar
part,
which
appears
after
four
bars,
takes
it’s
influence
from
the
extended
techniques
used
by
Tom
Morello
of
the
group,
Rage
Against
The
Machine.
While
this
section
is
very
different
from
what
preceded
it,
I
kept
some
reference
to
the
previous
written
sections
by
having
the
bass
play
a
repeated
figure
that
is
actually
the
first
five
notes
of
the
A
section
melody.
Despite
the
rock
influence
present
on
what
each
instrument
is
playing,
I
maintained
the
contemporary
jazz
feel
by
having
the
piano
play
a
D7#9b13,
which
keeps
a
harmonic
density
more
commonly
found
in
contemporary
jazz
than
rock.
Here
is
a
short
excerpt
of
the
final
section
of
the
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–Track
6
-‐
Lark
–
End
Section
1.4
-‐
Rehearsal
and
Adjustments
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
first
rehearsal
of
each
composition
usually
highlighted
the
areas
that
needed
adjustment
in
terms
of
arrangement,
orchestration
etc.
The
first
issue
that
arose
was
that
the
drummer
had
initially
been
instructed
to
play
through
the
hits
in
the
C
Section
of
the
melody,
while
the
rest
of
the
band
continued
to
play
the
melody
in
the
same
manner
as
the
A
section.
It
was
quickly
apparent
that
this
idea
didn’t
really
work,
as
the
rhythmic
complexity
of
what
was
written
for
the
guitar,
bass,
and
piano,
did
not
lend
itself
to
having
a
more
open
drum
feel
underneath
it.
The
support
provided
by
the
drums
playing
the
same
rhythm
as
the
rest
of
the
ensemble
meant
there
was
a
much
more
stable
and
coherent
feel
to
the
section.
Also,
during
the
rehearsal
the
drummer
was
asked
to
play
a
constant
quarter
note
on
each
beat
in
order
to
help
the
rest
of
us
to
play
our
parts,
but
this
would
not
be
necessary
in
the
recording
session,
as
we
would
be
playing
to
a
click
track.
After
listening
back
to
the
recording
the
decision
was
taken
to
change
the
introduction
of
the
composition
completely.
Initially
it
was
written
that
the
guitar
would
begin
the
piece
by
itself,
playing
the
first
phrase
of
the
A
section
melody,
before
being
joined
by
the
band
for
the
melody.
However,
this
introduction
was
too
brief,
and
also
it
meant
the
melody
was
being
played
too
many
times
at
the
beginning
of
the
piece.
It
seemed
a
longer
introduction
was
necessary,
something
that
would
ease
the
listener
into
the
composition.
In
order
to
achieve
this
a
variation
on
the
B
Section
chords
was
played,
with
a
long
crescendo
over
a
period
of
sixteen
bars.
The
first
three
chords
of
the
pattern
were
used
rather
than
all
four
because
it
gave
the
section
more
space,
and
helped
create
an
ethereal
yet
mildly
anxious
mood,
which
is
what
was
appropriate
to
the
piece.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
introduction
and
A
section
of
the
rehearsal
recording.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
7
–
Lark
Rehearsal
Intro
and
A
Section
After
listening
to
the
final
section
of
the
piece
it
seemed
that
while
the
guitar
part
using
extended
techniques,
(playing
behind
the
nut,
artificial
harmonics,
lots
of
distortion)was
interesting,
after
hearing
it
repeated
so
many
times
it
became
mundane.
In
order
to
fix
this,
the
part
was
changed
to
have
four
bars
of
just
rhythm
section
before
entering
with
the
guitar
part.
This
had
the
effect
of
easing
the
listener
in
to
the
new
atmosphere
created
by
this
section,
as
well
as
meaning
that
the
guitar
part
would
not
be
repeated
so
many
times
that
it
lost
it’s
effectiveness.
Another
change
that
I
felt
was
necessary
from
playing
the
composition
at
the
first
rehearsal
was
to
change
the
piano
part
to
be
played
on
keyboard.
The
sound
of
the
piano
didn’t
really
complement
the
modern,
distorted
guitar
sound,
and
it
seemed
that
an
electric
piano,
possibly
a
Fender
Rhodes
sound,
would
be
more
appropriate.
Also,
using
keyboard
over
piano
also
has
the
added
benefit
of
being
much
faster
and
easier
to
set
up
in
the
recording
session.
As
our
recording
sessions
were
just
three
hours
long,
every
opportunity
to
save
time
was
welcome.
1.5
–
Collaborative
Advice
As
mentioned
previously,
after
doing
a
rehearsal
and
a
recording
I
would
usually
take
the
recording
and
Finale
score
of
the
piece
to
Perico
Sambeat
during
his
office
hours
taking
notes
and
what
opinions
he
had
on
the
composition,
being
sure
to
consider
and
possibly
implement
them
before
the
next
rehearsal,
or
in
this
case,
the
recording
session.
The
first
thing
Perico
noticed
was
that
I
was
not
rhythmically
solid
when
playing
the
A
section
melody,
I
was
tending
to
drag
slightly
and
not
be
tight
with
what
the
rhythm
section
was
playing.
This
was
a
problem
that
was
easily
solved
by
making
sure
I
took
the
time
to
work
on
the
melody
with
a
metronome
before
going
to
the
recording
session.
Secondly,
a
suggestion
was
made
regarding
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo.
As
mentioned,
there
needed
to
be
a
release
from
all
the
tension
built
up
during
the
melody,
and
to
achieve
this
I
began
the
guitar
solo
with
the
B
section
chords,
but
this
time
played
for
a
bar
each
rather
than
two
beats.
While
Perico
agreed
with
the
intent
behind
this,
he
suggested
that
playing
these
chord
changes
for
just
eight
bars
was
not
sufficient
for
creating
the
atmosphere
intended.
As
a
result
of
this
advice
for
the
recording
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo
was
changed
to
have
sixteen
bars
of
these
chord
changes
before
reverting
to
eight
bars
of
the
B
section
changes.
He
also
suggested
that
the
rhythm
section
should
play
with
a
more
open
feel
at
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo,
in
order
to
aid
the
creation
of
the
specific
atmosphere
that
was
planned
for.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
beginning
of
the
guitar
solo
taken
from
the
rehearsal
recording.
•
Souncloud
Playlist
–
Track
8
–
Lark
Rehearsal
-‐
Beginning
of
Guitar
Solo
Another
suggestion
made
was
that
the
drums
could
play
more
busily
and
with
more
fills
for
the
final
section
of
the
piece.
However,
we
tried
this
quickly
before
the
recording
session
began
and
found
that
it
was
not
very
effective,
as
there
was
enough
interesting
information
happening
to
mean
that
the
most
effective
method
for
the
drums
to
complement
the
other
instruments
was
to
play
a
very
straightforward
backbeat,
providing
support
for
the
more
complex
parts
happening
elsewhere.
It
was
also
suggested
that
a
rall
leading
to
the
last
hit
would
be
worth
trying,
but
again,
this
was
tried
and
it
was
decided
that
keeping
everything
tight
and
cohesive
was
the
most
effective
way
to
end
the
piece.
Here
is
an
audio
sample,
taken
from
the
rehearsal
recording,
of
the
final
section
of
the
composition.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
9
–
Lark
Rehearsal
–
End
Section
As
well
as
seeking
compositional
advice
from
Perico,
advice
was
also
sought
on
soloing
over
the
changes
of
the
tune
from
my
private
lesson
instructor,
Israel
Sandoval.
From
listening
to
the
recording
he
could
tell
I
was
struggling
with
soloing
over
the
B
section
chords,
particularly
when
they
were
being
played
for
just
two
bars
each.
In
order
to
help
with
this
we
talked
about
picking
exact
ideas
to
work
on
for
this
section
to
ensure
the
solo
sounded
coherent
and
not
just
the
fast,
random
jumble
of
notes
played
on
the
rehearsal
recording.
We
concluded
that
the
sound
I
was
aiming
for
was
best
achieved
by
superimposing
pentatonic
scales
over
each
of
the
chords,
so
for
Em
and
Fmaj7#11
I
would
play
Em
pentatonic,
for
F#m11b13
and
Gmaj13
I
would
play
F#m
pentatonic.
These
scale
choices
would
also
be
combined
with
the
addition
of
an
extra
note
or
two
in
selected
places.
For
example
for
the
Fmaj7#11
chord
I
could
add
a
b9
to
Em
pentatonic,
for
the
F#m11b13
I
added
a
b13
to
F#m
pentatonic,
and
for
the
Gmaj13
I
once
again
added
a
b9
to
the
F#m
pentatonic.
1.6
–
Recording
The
recording
session
for
this
composition
was
from
20.00
–
23.00
on
the
13th
February
2014
at
the
Ann
Kreis
Scoring
Stage,
Berklee
Valencia.
The
engineer
for
the
session
was
Nick
Zeigler,
and
the
band
consisted
of
Daniel
Toledo
on
bass,
Piotr
Orzechowski
on
piano,
Joshua
Wheatley
on
drums,
as
well
as
myself
on
electric
guitar.
The
session
schedule
was
planned
to
be;
•
20.00-‐21.00
–
Setup.
•
21.00-‐22.00
–
Record
multiple
takes
of
piece.
•
22.00-‐22.30
–
Record
guitar
overdubs.
•
22.30-‐23.00
–
Tear
down
equipment.
The
overdubs
in
question
were
necessary
because
I
had
found
in
rehearsal
that
going
from
the
C
Section
melody
to
the
guitar
solo
was
very
difficult
to
achieve
with
accuracy
in
terms
of
switching
on
and
off
pedals.
To
ensure
I
got
a
neat
and
accurate
transition
between
sections
I
decided
to
not
play
the
C
Section
melody
during
the
take
with
the
full
band,
and
just
enter
with
the
first
note
of
the
solo,
overdubbing
the
melodic
part
later.
The
microphones
to
be
used
for
the
session
were
decided
in
advance
by
Nick
and
I
and
consisted
of;
•
Guitar
–
SM57
+
Reyer
121
•
Bass
–
D.I.
•
Keyboards
–
D.I.
•
Drums
–
Kick
-‐
AKG
D112,
Snare
-‐
SM57,
Toms
-‐
Sennheiser
421
Overheads
–
KM
184
All
of
these
microphones
were
ones
I
had
used
in
previous
sessions
that
I
had
achieved
a
sound
I
was
happy
with.
Particularly
the
combination
of
both
the
SM57
and
Reyer
121
on
the
guitar
is
something
I
have
found
to
be
very
effective
in
terms
of
capturing
the
sound
I
desired.
Below
is
a
picture
of
the
floor
plan
drawn
up
before
the
session.
Due
to
the
fact
that
the
keyboards
and
bass
were
being
recorded
through
a
D.I.
the
set
up
was
relatively
fast,
and
this
also
meant
that
we
could
all
record
in
the
same
room
because
the
guitar
amp
would
be
placed
in
the
isolation
booth,
therefore
eliminating
any
possibility
for
sound
bleeding
into
the
drum
microphones.
Due
to
the
fastidiousness
of
Nick
and
I’s
pre-‐production
organisational
efforts,
the
plan
and
agenda
for
the
recording
was
extremely
clear
and
therefore
went
very
smoothly.
The
schedule
was
maintained
and
we
had
ample
time
to
record
several
takes
of
the
track,
as
well
as
do
the
guitar
overdub
of
which
I
previously
spoke.
The
only
aspect
of
the
recording
I
was
unhappy
with
was
the
guitar
part
over
the
end
section
of
the
composition.
I
felt
that
I
hadn’t
played
to
the
part
with
a
level
of
accuracy
I
was
happy
with,
so
to
fix
this
I
booked
a
slot
in
studio
A
and
overdubbed
this
section,
using
the
same
microphones.
In
post-‐production,
I
did
the
edits
of
the
takes
using
Pro
Tools,
the
track
was
mixed
by
Ryan
Renteria,
and
mastered
by
Alan
Tishk.
The
only
issue
that
arose
in
the
post
production
process
was
that
the
intent
of
having
the
keyboard
melody
at
section
B
begin
very
quietly
and
increase
in
volume
over
the
course
of
the
section
was
not
very
effective,
as
it
created
a
sense
of
uncertainty
as
to
what
was
happening
at
the
start
of
the
section.
This
problem
was
easily
solved
by
simply
raising
he
volume
of
the
keyboard
in
the
mix,
thereby
creating
a
more
purposeful
feel
to
the
beginning
of
the
B
section.
Here
is
the
audio
for
the
final
product
of
my
composition
“Lark”.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
10
–
Lark
1.7
–
Lessons
Learned
The
main
area
in
which
I
increased
my
knowledge
over
the
course
of
writing,
rehearsing,
and
recording
this
piece
was
in
the
field
of
traditional
Irish
music.
Studying
and
listening
to
the
recordings
before
I
began
to
write
was
extremely
enlightening,
reinforcing
my
initial
feeling
that
it
is
important
for
me
to
make
more
of
an
effort
to
increase
my
knowledge
in
terms
of
the
traditional
music
of
my
country.
The
main
area
that
impressed
me
the
most
was
the
seemingly
inexhaustible
supply
of
melodic
material
contained
within
each
track.
To
be
able
to
continually
have
memorable,
interesting,
technically
demanding
melodies,
while
never
really
straying
from
diatonic
note
choices
and
harmony,
is
something
I
could
benefit
from
studying
more
of,
as
I
have
a
tendency
to
overcomplicate
melodies
and
therefore
dilute
their
effectiveness.
The
time
I
spent
researching
this
music
has
definitely
ensured
that
in
the
future
I
will
spend
time
working
on
traditional
Irish
music,
both
in
order
to
have
a
better
understanding
of
the
musical
heritage
of
my
country,
as
well
as
to
reap
the
benefits
of
absorbing
some
of
it’s
musical
characteristics.
Another
area
in
which
I
increased
my
knowledge
was
in
terms
of
the
use
of
minor
pentatonic
scales
with
added
altered
notes.
Using
minor
pentatonics
over
major
chords
is
an
approach
I
regularly
employ
in
both
composition
and
improvising,
but
the
simple
idea
of
just
adding
one
or
two
notes
contained
within
the
chord
of
the
moment
to
the
minor
pentatonic
scale
had
never
really
occurred
to
me.
This
new
skill
has
given
me
a
new
sound
and
colour
to
use
for
both
my
compositions
and
solos.
Whereas
previously
my
use
of
minor
pentatonics,
while
being
a
sound
I
enjoy,
may
have
become
slightly
predictable
and
overused,
now
I
have
been
provided
with
a
way
to
keep
the
sound
and
feel
that
I
enjoy
while
adding
a
new
dimension
to
keep
both
the
listener,
and
myself,
interested.
A
third
area
in
which
I
could
say
I
increased
my
learning
was
in
the
compositional
approach
of
the
piece.
While
I
regularly
use
very
specific
references
and
influences
when
I
compose,
I
had
never
specifically
focused
on
an
existing
melody
and
then
altered
it
to
fit
my
compositional
needs.
This
is
something
I
would
definitely
consider
doing
in
future
compositions,
as
it
was
a
great
way
to
provide
myself
with
a
starting
point
for
ideas,
although
I
would
have
to
be
careful
about
how
I
do
this
with
other
compositions.
Using
traditional
melodies
is
perfectly
acceptable
because
they
are
all
in
the
public
domain
and
not
under
copyright,
if
I
were
to
do
the
same
approach
for
copyrighted
material
I
would
be
at
risk
of
entering
morally
dubious
territory,
as
I
would
not
be
comfortable
with
the
idea
of
directly
copying
from
another
person’s
melodic
work.
I
also
feel
that
this
approach
of
looking
at
a
previously
unfamiliar
style
of
music
in
order
to
gain
compositional
ideas
is
a
great
way
to
introduce
oneself
to
new
music,
instantly
applying
the
benefits
of
some
new
knowledge
to
your
own
playing.
2
–
“Umbra”
2.1
–
Initial
Intention
For
this
piece,
I
employed
the
musical
influence
of
one
of
my
former
classmates
on
my
own
playing.
While
studying
for
my
undergraduate
degree,
I
spent
four
years
in
the
same
class
as
fellow
Irish
guitarist,
Chris
Guilfoyle.
Chris
is
an
extremely
skilled
composer
and
guitarist,
in
both
the
jazz
and
electronic
music
idioms.
I
had
always
been
a
fan
of
his
compositional
style,
and
spending
such
a
long
time
studying
in
the
same
composition
class,
I
am
quite
familiar
with
his
approach.
I
decided
that
rather
than
be
envious
of
his
work,
I
would
be
better
off
learning
from
his
style
and
applying
it
to
my
own
writing.
I
decided
straight
away
that
although
I
wanted
Chris’
music
to
be
the
main
influence
for
this
piece,
I
did
not
want
to
directly
use
any
of
his
written
material
as
a
reference,
as
this
would
be
more
like
copying
rather
than
being
influenced
by.
Instead,
I
just
tried
to
think
about
some
of
the
characteristics
of
his
work
and
then
apply
it
to
the
piece
I
wished
to
write.
The
main
characteristics
were;
•
Dense
sounding,
unusual
chords.
•
Complex
melodies.
•
Use
of
guitar
effects
pedals.
•
The
influence
of
electronic
music.
With
these
influences
in
mind
I
set
out
to
write
a
piece
that
had
some
of
the
characteristics
of
Chris’
work,
but
that
would
still
fit
with
my
own
musical
style.
2.2
–
The
Writing
Process
Before
beginning
the
piece
I
knew
that
I
wanted
to
write
this
composition
with
a
groove
based
on
the
drum
and
bass
style
of
electronic
music.
This
is
an
influence
taken
from
the
music
of
Chris
Guilfoyle,
but
as
well
as
that
it
is
a
style
that
I
have
also
admired
many
times
in
the
work
of
Erik
Truffaz,
Jojo
Mayer,
and
Aphex
Twin.
Knowing
the
rhythmic
style
of
the
piece
before
beginning
meant
that
the
rest
of
the
material
could
be
written
using
what
is
commonly
found
in
this
style;
relatively
slow
harmonic
rhythm,
chromatically
moving
basslines,
tension
created
by
the
busyness
of
the
drum
feel,
etc.
The
first
part
of
the
composition
that
I
began
working
on
was
the
chords
for
the
A
section.
I
had
been
experimenting
with
the
idea
of
constant
structures
in
guitar
voicings,
and
felt
this
was
the
perfect
opportunity
to
use
them.
The
idea
in
question
was
to
begin
with
an
Fmaj13
voicing
and
then
shift
it
downward
by
a
tone
each
time,
this
had
the
effect
of
having
an
initially
aurally
pleasant
chord
that
became
darker
and
more
dissonant
each
time
it
moved.
The
resulting
chords
were;
Fmaj13,
Ebmaj13b9,
Db69(addb9).
Initially
it
seemed
that
having
a
three
chord
sequence
would
be
an
interesting
way
of
creating
a
cyclic
feel
to
the
A
section,
but
after
playing
through
it
a
few
times
it
became
apparent
that
the
density
of
the
chords
combined
with
this
cyclic
feel
actually
made
the
sequence
quite
unpleasant
to
listen
to.
To
fix
this
one
extra
chord
was
added,
keeping
the
same
structure
and
once
again
moving
down
a
tone,
this
time
producing
a
Bm11
chord.
The
effect
of
having
an
aurally
pleasant
chord
at
the
beginning
and
end
of
the
sequence
gave
it
a
sense
of
overall
balance
and
relief
once
the
sequence
reached
the
fourth
chord.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
A
section
chords,
as
played
at
the
introduction
of
the
piece.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
11
–
Umbra
A
Section
Chords
It
had
been
decided
that
complex
melodies
were
one
of
the
influences
that
should
be
channeled
so
a
technique
was
employed
described
to
us
in
a
composition
masterclass
by
Berklee
Valencia
faculty
member,
Polo
Ortí.
Polo
told
us
his
method
of
coming
up
with
melodies
was
to
solo
over
the
changes
and
then
pick
out
the
parts
he
liked
and
use
them
as
a
melody.
This
is
an
effective
method
for
creating
a
complex
melody
so
I
looped
the
chord
progression
on
a
sequencer
and
then
recorded
myself
soloing
over
the
changes.
I
then
would
listen
back
to
what
I
played,
choose
some
appropriate
and
effective
parts,
then
solo
again,
this
time
keeping
whatever
I
liked
from
the
previous
take,
repeating
this
process
until
there
was
a
full
A
Section
melody
written
down.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
A
section
melody.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
12
–
Umbra
–
A
Section
For
the
B
Section,
in
order
to
provide
contrast,
as
well
as
a
relief
from
the
busyness
of
the
A
Section,
I
decided
that
I
would
reverse
the
roles
of
the
harmonic
and
melodic
instruments,
this
time
making
the
melody
extremely
simple
and
increasing
the
amount
of
movement
in
the
chord
sequence.
This
section
seemed
appropriate
to
introduce
chromatic
movement
in
the
bass
line.
Slash
chords
were
used
to
achieve
this
movement
while
tensions
were
added
to
the
voicings
to
create
the
necessary
harmonic
flavour.
An
Eb
note
was
kept
as
the
top
note
of
each
voicing,
so
that
although
the
chords
are
very
different
and
not
necessarily
belonging
to
the
same
harmonic
universe,
there
is
a
consistency
between
the
changes
as
the
top
note
keeps
all
the
chords
connected.
The
plan
was
to
keep
the
B
Section
melody
extremely
simple,
in
order
to
this
I
decided
on
just
a
two
note
motif
with
a
harmony
part
underneath
repeating
the
Eb
note
common
to
all
the
chords.
The
simplicity
of
the
melody
of
this
section
is
a
welcome
respite
from
the
freneticism
of
the
previous
section,
and
also
the
space
created
by
having
a
static
melody
also
gives
the
rhythm
section
a
chance
to
play
more
busily
and
create
new
ideas
of
interest
within
their
parts.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
B
Section
of
the
piece.
•
Souncloud
Playlist
Track
13
–
Umbra
–
B
Section
After
repeating
the
A
and
B
sections,
it
seemed
that
there
needed
to
be
a
new
segment
of
melodic
information
before
going
to
solos.
In
keeping
with
the
overall
compositional
aspiration
of
maintaining
the
listenability
and
accessibility
of
the
piece,
it
appeared
that
a
minor
pentatonic
based
melody
would
be
appropriate
as
it
would
be
a
familiar
sound
to
the
listeners
ear,
as
well
as
being
a
middle
ground
between
the
extreme
busyness
of
the
A
Section
and
the
melodic
simplicity
of
the
B
Section.
With
this
in
mind
the
chords
were
worked
on
first,
choosing
to
maintain
the
chromatic
bass
movement
of
the
B
Section,
this
time
with
slightly
different
chord
tensions.
The
structure
of
these
chords
once
again
take
their
influence
from
the
playing
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel.
The
chord
is
constructed
by
playing
a
root,
third,
and
an
open
G
string,
then
playing
a
bass
note
a
fourth
down
from
the
root
note.
All
the
notes
aside
from
the
open
G
are
then
moved
down
a
semitone
for
the
second
chord.
The
interval
of
a
fourth
at
the
bottom
of
the
chord,
combined
with
the
interval
of
a
major
seventh
contained
within
the
rest
of
the
chord,
creates
a
very
dark
and
relatively
dissonant
sound.
In
order
to
once
again
keep
coherence
between
the
chords,
Eb
was
added
as
the
top
note
of
the
chord,
this
being
the
#9
of
the
C
major
7th
chord
and
the
major
3rd
of
the
Bmaj
chord.
Then
begins
the
first
solo,
which
is
played
by
guitar.
The
structure
of
this
is
that
the
guitar
plays
over
the
first
sixteen
bars
of
the
A
Section,
which
is
repeated,
then
followed
by
the
next
part
of
the
A
section,
played
for
sixteen
bars.
As
a
written
section
between
the
first
and
second
solo,
the
third
melodic
section
is
repeated,
played
by
both
piano
and
guitar,
this
time
with
the
guitar
playing
the
part
a
fifth
above
the
piano.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
end
of
the
guitar
solo,
going
into
the
melodic
section
before
the
piano
solo.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
14
–
Umbra
–
End
of
Solo
For
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo,
it
seemed
that
it
would
be
effective
to
have
a
break
from
the
aggressiveness
of
the
rhythms
of
the
composition
up
to
this
point,
so
the
guitar
and
bass
drop
out
while
the
drums
were
instructed
to
play
a
less
busy
figure
than
in
the
previous
section.
The
piano
and
drums
play
together
for
16
bars
before
being
rejoined
by
the
bass
and
returning
to
the
drum
and
bass
influenced
groove
of
the
previous
sections.
The
chords
for
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo
are
taken
from
the
B
Section
of
the
piece,
then
after
thirty-‐two
bars
of
these
chords
the
guitar
re-‐enters
with
a
melodic
line
while
the
piano
continues
to
solo,
this
time
over
the
A
section
chords.
The
purpose
of
the
guitar
melody
line
is
once
again
to
provide
a
variation
on
material
that
has
already
been
heard,
while
also
surprising
the
listener
with
something
unexpected.
Here
is
an
audio
extract
of
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo,
rejoining
of
the
band,
and
introduction
of
guitar.
•
Souncloud
Playlist
–
Track
15
–
Umbra
Piano
Solo
In
order
to
end
the
piece,
a
drum
solo
seemed
appropriate.
To
provide
an
ostinato
for
the
drums
to
solo
over,
a
repeated
melodic
figure
was
developed
over
the
chords
of
the
B
Section.
Similarly
to
the
B
Section
of
the
melody
the
scale
used
to
create
the
melody
was
Eb
minor
pentatonic,
thereby
retaining
a
similar
flavour
to
the
previously
heard
material
but
still
providing
the
listener
with
something
new.
This
figure
is
repeated
until
a
cue
from
the
drummer,
with
everybody
playing
a
hit
on
the
last
melody
note
of
the
phrase.
2.3
–
Rehearsal
and
Adjustments
The
first
rehearsal
of
this
piece
immediately
brought
about
one
extreme
change
to
the
composition.
The
melody
was
initially
written
to
be
doubled
by
saxophone
for
the
A
Section,
and
then
the
melody
was
to
be
divided
between
guitar
and
saxophone
for
the
B
Section.
As
it
turned
out,
the
saxophonist
didn’t
show
up
for
the
rehearsal.
While
this
seemed
to
be
a
problem
at
first,
it
turned
out
to
be
quite
convenient
as
after
some
quick
adjustments
it
was
decided
that
saxophone
was
not
necessary
for
the
composition.
Firstly
it
was
decided
that
the
melody
at
A
could
stand
by
itself
without
needing
to
be
doubled
by
piano,
then
for
the
B
section
it
was
possible
for
the
guitar
to
play
both
the
parts
that
were
written
for
saxophone
and
guitar.
This
turned
out
to
function
quite
well
as
for
the
first
eight
bars
the
guitar
plays
the
two
note
melody,
before
adding
the
lower
Eb
drone
that
was
intended
for
saxophone.
Here
is
the
resulting
melody
for
the
B
Section,
With
the
guitar
playing
both
the
parts
written
for
guitar
and
saxophone.
Another
adjustment
to
be
made
involved
the
melodic
section
leading
in
to
the
guitar
solo.
Initially
this
phrase
was
to
be
played
for
eight
bars
by
just
saxophone,
with
the
keyboards
joining
for
the
repetition
of
these
eight
bars,
while
guitar
played
the
chords.
In
the
rehearsal,
the
piano
took
the
first
eight
bars
of
the
melody
while
the
guitar
played
chords
for
the
first
eight,
beginning
to
play
melody
for
the
second
eight.
On
listening
back
to
the
rehearsal
recording,
it
was
apparent
that
while
the
dense
and
dark
mood
created
by
these
specific
chord
voicings
was
very
effective
when
played
by
just
guitar,
in
the
context
of
the
piece
it
didn’t
really
work
as
they
created
an
excess
of
information
in
the
low
register,
cluttering
the
overall
sound.
To
amend
this,
the
solution
was
to
have
the
piano
play
the
melody
for
the
first
eight
bars
with
no
chords
behind
it
and
the
guitar
would
then
join
playing
the
melody
for
the
next
eight
bars.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
this
section
from
the
rehearsal
recording,
then
from
the
final
product.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
16
–
Umbra
–
C
Section
Changes
The
final
aspect
of
the
piece
that
needed
to
be
changed
due
to
the
lack
of
a
saxophone
was
the
end
section.
The
written
part
indicated
that
the
saxophone
should
play
a
harmonization
a
fourth
above
the
melodic
line
written
for
guitar,
instead
of
having
the
keyboard
play
this,
the
use
of
a
guitar
effects
pedal
was
employed,
specifically
a
Digitech
Whammy,
as
this
can
be
programmed
to
harmonise
a
fourth
above.
The
final
change
that
came
about
specifically
as
a
result
of
the
rehearsal
was
regarding
the
drum
part.
The
score
had
indicated
that
for
the
first
sixteen
bars
of
the
introduction
the
drums
should
fill
space,
mostly
using
cymbals,
playing
freely
without
regard
to
the
tempo.
However,
while
following
these
instructions
in
the
rehearsal,
the
drummer
played
a
short
phrase
of
rhythms
in
tempo
on
the
closed
hi-‐hat,
momentarily
creating
a
very
effective
accompaniment
for
the
guitar
part.
Similarly,
for
the
first
sixteen
bars
of
the
piano
solo,
the
score
indicated
that
the
drums
should
play
very
busily,
responding
to
what
the
piano
played,
almost
in
the
form
of
a
dual
solo.
However,
upon
hearing
this
small
section
of
the
drums
playing
this
closed
hi-‐hat
rhythm
for
the
introduction,
it
was
instantly
apparent
that
this
idea,
employed
for
the
entirety
of
each
of
those
separate
sections,
would
be
much
more
effective
than
what
had
originally
been
written
for
the
drummer
to
play.
Here
is
an
audio
extract
of
the
beginning
of
the
piece
from
the
rehearsal
recording,
followed
by
the
beginning
of
the
piece
from
the
final
product.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Umbra
–
Intro
Changes
2.4
–
Collaborative
Advice
Upon
listening
to
the
rehearsal
recording
with
Perico
Sambeat,
he
remarked
that
the
chords
when
played
by
the
keyboards
over
the
A
Section
clashed
with
some
of
the
melody
notes.
This
appeared
to
be
true,
but
upon
investigation
it
seemed
more
likely
that
the
instructions
given
to
the
piano
at
this
part
were
at
the
root
of
the
issue.
As
the
chords
for
the
A
section
are
the
same
for
the
introduction,
they
are
of
course
based
on
a
specific
guitar
voicing
making
up
a
sequence
of;
|
Fmaj13
|
Ebmaj13b9
|
Db69(addb9)|
Bm11
|
The
specific
guitar
voicings
were
written
in
the
piano
part
as
sample
voicings
to
help
with
constructing
these
unusual
chords,
also
with
the
instructions
to
omit
the
5th
during
any
comping.
While
these
voicings
are
very
effective
on
guitar,
this
information
is
probably
far
too
specific
and
limiting
to
give
to
a
pianist.
In
order
to
fix
the
problem
I
then
studied
the
notes
contained
within
the
melody
and
realised
that
they
were
almost
entirely
contained
within
the
Lydian
Augmented
scale
of
each
chord
they
were
being
played
over.
This
meant
that
while
the
chords
for
the
introduction
could
stay
as
specifically
intended
for
guitar,
for
the
melody
the
chords
for
piano
could
be
written
as;
|Fmaj13#5
|
Ebmaj13#5
|
Dbmaj7#5
|
Bm11
|
This
eradicated
the
problem
that
was
noticed
regarding
the
clash
of
melody
and
chord,
as
well
as
having
the
added
bonus
of
allowing
the
pianist
much
more
freedom
of
expression,
as
indicated
in
the
following
recorded
material.
The
first
excerpt
is
from
the
rehearsal
followed
by
the
finished
product.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
18
–
Umbra
–
Voicing
Changes
A
second
point
that
was
raised
in
this
meeting
was
there
was
possibly
too
much
contrast
between
the
A
and
B
Section
melody,
Perico
suggesting
that
perhaps
the
A
Section
melody
could
benefit
from
being
less
busy
and
the
B
Section
could
have
more
movement
melodically.
This
was
a
suggestion
that
made
sense
and
was
worth
considering,
but
due
to
time
constraints
before
the
recording,
was
not
possible
to
investigate
fully.
However,
having
completed
the
recording
with
the
melodies
in
this
manner,
it
seems
that
the
melodic
contrast
between
the
sections
is
very
effective,
as
it
also
allows
room
for
more
contrast
between
what
the
rhythm
section
is
playing
between
the
A
and
B
Sections,
which
was
an
effective
way
of
both
maintaining
the
interest
of
the
listener,
as
well
as
keeping
the
musicians
themselves
engaged.
Having
gained
some
advice
on
the
compositional
aspect
of
the
piece
I
also
met
with
Israel
Sandoval
to
discuss
the
scale
options
available
for
soloing
over
the
tune,
particularly
over
the
A
section
chords.
As
has
been
previously
mentioned,
the
chords
for
this
section
of
the
piece
are
unusual
and
as
a
consequence,
were
quite
difficult
to
solo
comfortably
over.
Together,
Israel
and
I
investigated
what
would
be
possible
options
for
each
chord,
also
with
the
aim
of
discovering
which
options
blended
the
changes
together
with
most
cohesion,
while
also
being
aware
of
what
would
be
a
logical
mental
process
for
changing
between
chords.
The
resulting
scale
chord
relationships
were;
•
Fmaj13
–
D
Minor
(all
variations
of,
Melodic,
Harmonic,
Natural
Minor)
•
Ebmaj13b9
–
D,
Eb,
E,
A,
Bb,
B
–
Limited
Transposition
Scale
•
Db69(addb9)
–
D,
E,
F,
Gb,
G
–
Limited
Transposition
Scale
•
Bm11
–
Bb
Augmented
Scale
The
term
“Limited
Transposition
Scale,”
implies
a
scale
that
fulfills
specific
criteria
with
regards
to
their
symmetry
and
their
interval
groups.
This
was
a
concept
previously
unfamiliar
to
me,
and
was
very
effective
in
terms
of
creating
new
ideas
for
soloing
over
these
chords,
and
for
soloing
in
general.
As
it
turned
out,
because
of
the
changes
to
the
chordal
information
given
to
the
keyboards,
these
scales
were
not
strictly
necessary
for
soloing
over
this
section,
as
Lydian
Augmented
would
now
fit
each
chord.
However,
the
use
of
these
scales
did
provide
an
extra
ingredient
to
employ
during
the
solo
which,
when
combined
with
the
Lydian
Augmented
scales,
created
a
sound
that
was
very
specific
to
this
piece
and
therefore
very
effective.
2.5
–
Recording
The
recording
session
for
“Umbra”
was
20.00-‐23.00,
on
the
9th
April
2014
at
the
Ann
Kreis
Scroing
Stage,
Berklee
Valencia.
The
engineer
for
the
session
was
Alayna
Hughes,
and
the
band
consisted
of
Daniel
Toledo
on
electric
bass,
Piotr
Orzechowski
on
keyboards,
Joshua
Wheatley
on
drums,
as
well
as
myself
on
electric
guitar.
The
session
schedule
was
planned
to
be;
•
20.00-‐21.00
–
Setup.
•
21.00-‐22.30
–
Record
multiple
takes
of
piece.
•
22.30-‐23.00
–
Tear
down
equipment.
The
microphones
to
be
used
for
the
session
were
decided
in
advance
by
Alayna
and
I
and
consisted
of;
•
Guitar
–
SM57
+
Reyer
121
•
Bass
–
D.I.
•
Keyboards
–
D.I.
•
Drums
–
Kick
-‐
AKG
D112,
Snare
-‐
SM57,
Toms
-‐
Sennheiser
421
Overheads
–
KM
184
Below
is
a
picture
of
the
floor
plan
for
the
session.
As
in
the
recording
session
written
about
in
the
previous
chapter,
the
effort
that
went
into
the
pre-‐production
and
organisation
process
meant
that
everything
ran
smoothly
for
the
session,
ensuring
ample
time
was
available
for
recording
enough
takes
until
a
satisfactory
product
was
a
certainty.
In
post-‐production,
I
completed
the
edits
using
Pro
Tools,
the
mix
was
done
by
Ryan
Renteria,
and
mastering
by
Alan
Tishk.
As
the
recording
session
went
very
smoothly
and
the
arrangement
was
well
prepared,
no
problems
arose
in
post
production,
the
only
difficulty
lay
in
choosing
from
the
many
takes,
as
each
had
it’s
own
appeal.
Here
is
the
final
product
of
the
composition
“Umbra”.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
19
-‐
Umbra
2.6
-‐
Lessons
Learned
The
main
area
I
increased
my
knowledge
over
the
course
of
writing
and
arranging
this
piece
was
in
the
field
of
chord-‐scale
relationships.
Learning
about
Limited
Transposition
scales
has
provided
an
area
for
intensive
further
study
in
the
future,
while
also
immediately
granting
me
some
new
sounds
and
ideas
for
my
improvisational
repertoire.
The
second
area
in
which
I
could
say
I
learned,
was
with
regard
the
last
minute
changing
of
the
ensemble
line
up.
While
initially
the
fact
that
the
saxophonist
failed
to
show
up
for
a
rehearsal
was
a
great
source
of
irritation
to
me,
in
the
end
the
composition
ended
up
being
much
more
effective
in
the
quartet
format.
This
was
a
good
lesson
in
terms
of
not
assuming
the
worst
when
presented
with
an
obstacle,
as
well
as
how
to
change
arrangements
quickly
and
intuitively.
Also,
I
learned
that
the
original
intent
for
the
composition
does
not
have
to
be
maintained
in
order
to
end
with
a
satisfactory
product.
After
having
decided
that
the
main
influence
for
the
piece
was
going
to
be
the
work
of
a
certain
composer,
the
more
time
spent
on
the
composition,
the
less
this
seemed
relevant.
However,
starting
with
an
obvious
intent
was
extremely
helpful
in
terms
of
speeding
up
the
composing
process,
as
it
gave
the
beginning
stages
some
guidelines
to
follow
and
an
immediate
focus,
which
was
helpful
in
terms
of
speeding
up
the
decision
making
process.
3
–
“Dip”
3.1
–
Initial
Intention
The
initial
intention
for
this
composition
was
to
build
a
piece
around
a
main
idea
that
employed
the
use
of
extended
guitar
techniques.
The
approach
of
using
unusual
noises
and
textures
on
guitar
is
a
technique
that
takes
its
influence
from
guitarists
such
as
Tom
Morello
and
Jeff
Beck.
The
use
of
harmonics,
bending
of
notes
behind
the
nut
of
the
guitar,
as
well
as
playing
notes
behind
the
nut,
are
all
approaches
that
I
regularly
apply
to
my
playing,
especially
when
performing
in
the
hip-‐hop
genre,
as
the
guitar
can
sometimes
be
in
the
position
of
replicating
a
DJ/turntablist.
It
seemed
that
incorporating
these
techniques
into
an
original
composition
would
be
an
effective
way
of
developing
my
own
voice
both
as
an
instrumentalist
and
as
a
composer.
3.2
–
The
Writing
Process
The
first
step
in
this
composition
was
to
come
up
with
the
extended
technique
idea
that
would
be
the
main
hook,
or
focus,
of
the
piece.
This
was
an
extremely
quick
process
because,
as
mentioned
before,
this
is
an
approach
I
regularly
take
in
my
playing,
and
therefore
have
an
accumulation
of
ideas
to
draw
from.
Also,
this
approach
to
guitar
playing
is
not
very
common
and
as
a
result
it
isn’t
necessary
to
be
painstaking
in
terms
of
attempting
not
to
sound
to
derivative,
most
of
the
sounds
attempted
have
a
character
that
is
particular
to
the
composer.
After
a
short
time
trying
some
ideas,
the
phrase
was
finalised.
It
employs
the
three
techniques
spoken
of
earlier,
harmonics,
bending
behind
the
nut,
and
playing
behind
the
nut,
as
well
as
guitar
effects
pedals
in
the
form
of
distortion
and
digital
delay.
Here
is
an
audio
example
of
the
phrase
in
question.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
20
–
Dip
–
Extended
Techniques
Once
the
motif
was
finalised,
the
next
step
was
to
find
chords
to
complement
it.
Melodic
Minor
harmony
is
an
area
that
was
being
explored
at
that
time
in
my
private
lesson
and
therefore
was
a
sound
that
was
very
present
in
my
playing
at
the
time.
It
seemed
that
the
dark
character
of
a
major7#5
chord
would
be
the
perfect
choice
to
complement
this
motif
and
because
the
motif
is
basically
atonal,
any
combination
of
maj7#5
chords
was
possible.
After
many
varied
attempts
at
different
combinations
and
durations
of
time
for
each
chord.
The
most
effective
solution
was
to
play
Cmaj7#5
and
Ebmaj7#5
for
one
bar
each.
Here
is
an
audio
example
of
the
guitar
motif
played
with
the
harmony.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
21
–
Dip
–
Motif
with
Chords
In
order
to
maintain
a
similar
atmosphere
for
the
introduction
and
the
melody,
it
seemed
that
it
would
be
effective
to
use
the
same
chords,
but
change
the
harmonic
rhythm
in
order
to
provide
a
slight
difference
to
what
had
previously
been
heard.
Therefore
the
chord
qualities
remained
the
same,
Cmaj7#5
and
Ebmaj7#5,
but
this
time
they
are
played
for
two
bars
each.
The
melody
itself
begins
with
a
four
bar
phrase;
The
last
bar
of
this
phrase
is
then
sequenced,
and
repeated
four
times
with
small
ornamentations.
To
end
the
phrase
the
first
two
bars
of
the
of
the
melody
are
repeated,
then
only
the
first
two
notes
of
the
third
bar
are
repeated,
allowing
some
space
before
the
introductory
motif
returns.
The
intent
behind
the
construction
of
this
melody
was,
in
order
to
contrast
with
what
had
preceded
it,
to
keep
it
simple
and
aurally
accessible,
while
the
fact
that
the
repetition
of
the
first
phrase
is
not
concluded
in
the
same
fashion
as
the
first
time
it
is
heard
may
be
an
effective
way
of
surprising
the
listener.
Also,
the
melody
itself
is
not
necessarily
played
strictly
as
written,
artistic
license
is
granted
in
terms
of
string
bends
and
articulation.
Here
is
an
audio
extract
of
the
A
Section
melody.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
22
–
Dip
–
A
Section
Melody
Following
the
melody
is
a
repetition
of
the
extended
techniques
of
the
introduction,
this
time
with
second
half
of
the
phrase
played
first,
once
again
the
intent
behind
this
was
written
with
the
intent
of
repeating
previously
heard
material,
but
with
a
slight
change
to
hold
the
listener’s
interest.
While
writing,
it
seemed
that
simply
repeating
the
information
heard
in
the
A
Section
melody
needed
to
be
heard
again
before
any
new
material
was
introduced.
However,
simply
repeating
the
melody
seemed
too
predictable,
so
the
most
effective
choice
was
to
repeat
the
melody
except
play
a
segment
of
it,
a
few
variations
were
attempted,
eventually
the
most
effective
method
seemed
to
be
to
play
bar
five-‐
twelve
of
the
previously
heard
section.
For
the
B
Section,
the
chords
were
the
first
element
of
the
section
to
be
written.
The
sound
of
a
Cmaj7/G
chord
when
played
on
guitar
using
of
the
open
G,
B,
and
E
strings,
creates
a
light,
yet
unsettling
atmosphere
that
fitted
the
composition
well.
In
order
to
work
this
voicing
into
the
composition,
semi-‐tonal
bass
movement
was
employed,
once
again
with
the
influence
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel’s
compositions
in
mind.
The
bottom
three
notes
of
the
chord
can
be
moved
while
the
open
strings
are
kept
the
same
for
each
voicing,
resulting
in
a
progression
of;
After
experimenting
with
different
places
on
the
fretboard
this
voicing
would
work,
using
a
similar
pattern
starting
with
Bb
as
the
bass
note
proved
to
be
very
effective.
However,
the
structure
of
the
chord
couldn’t
remain
the
same
for
each
voicing
as
it
became
extremely
dissonant.
To
remedy
this
while
still
maintaining
the
chromatic
movement,
the
structure
of
the
voicing
was
changed
slightly
in
order
to
accommodate
the
use
of
open
strings.
The
resulting
progression
was;
At
the
time
of
writing
this
section,
the
actual
chordal
values
were
not
of
prime
importance,
as
the
main
objective
was
to
create
the
necessary
atmosphere
and
mood.
Considering
the
harmonic
content
of
these
voicings
only
became
a
concern
when
writing
the
changes
for
solo
sections.
After
playing
the
progression
a
few
times,
it
seemed
that
a
more
aurally
satisfying
way
for
it
to
be
played
would
be
to
begin
with
the
section
starting
on
Bb,
playing
the
Cmaj7/G
chord
on
what
would
be
bar
five
of
an
eight
bar
sequence.
Melodically,
what
it
seemed
this
section
needed
was
a
repetitive
melodic
figure
that
provided
contrast
with
all
the
chordal
movement.
After
exploring
different
options,
what
was
very
effective
was
maintaining
the
same
top
note
of
the
motif
throughout
the
entire
progression,
while
having
any
movement
kept
to
the
lower
register
of
the
melody.
Despite
the
unusual
harmony
this
provided
a
sense
of
connectedness
throughout
the
section.
After
deciding
on
an
initial
motif
to
complement
the
first
chord,
motivic
transformation
was
applied,
keeping
the
rhythm
the
same
but
changing
the
melody
notes
according
to
the
chord
of
the
moment.
The
most
effective
way
to
play
this
six
bar
phrase
seemed
to
be
to
play
with
just
guitar
and
piano,
then
repeat
it
with
bass
and
drums,
playing
a
crescendo
over
the
six
bars
before
resting
on
a
Fmaj7#11
chord.
A
repetition
of
the
initial
guitar
introduction
seemed
appropriate
at
this
point,
but
in
order
not
to
present
the
same
material
in
exactly
the
same
fashion,
beat
four
was
removed
from
the
second
bar
of
the
phrase,
meaning
the
band
would
play
the
first
beat
of
the
solo
section
earlier
than
the
listener
would
expect.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
B
Section,
moving
into
the
first
solo
of
the
piece.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
22
–
Dip
–
B
Section
For
the
guitar
solo,
the
first
section
uses
the
chords
found
in
the
A
Section
melody,
with
the
simple
addition
of
a
D9#11
chord
to
provide
a
brief
change
of
colour
from
the
constant
major7#5
voicings.
The
next
section
of
the
solo
uses
chords
from
the
B
Section,
and
therefore
required
some
consideration
as
to
their
theoretical
makeup,
in
order
to
provide
information
for
the
soloist.
Rather
than
just
use
the
B
Section
in
it’s
entirety
for
the
solo,
what
seemed
to
be
more
effective
was
to
do
a
slight
variation
on
the
first
half
of
this
section,
turning
it
into
a
four
bar
phrase
rather
than
three,
partially
to
create
interest
for
the
listener,
but
also
to
alleviate
some
pressure
on
the
soloist,
as
the
chords
themselves
are
quite
complicated
without
having
to
consider
unusual
form
lengths
too.
The
above
chords
are
the
four
bar
sequence
that
were
chosen
as
a
variation
on
the
B
Section
to
play
during
the
guitar
solo.
After
the
guitar
solo
there
is
an
interlude,
which
shall
be
described
in
detail
later,
before
the
beginning
of
the
piano
solo,
which
plays
over
the
same
chords
as
the
guitar
solo,
but
with
the
order
reversed,
the
piano
beginning
with
the
chromatically
moving
chords
based
on
the
B
section
melody,
then
moving
onto
the
chords
based
on
the
A
Section.
After
the
piano
solo
there
is
a
drum
feature
spread
over
a
twenty-‐two
bar
section.
The
musical
content
of
this
section
is
based
on
the
B
Section
of
the
melody,
using
the
same
chords
but
introducing
a
new,
extremely
simple
motif
on
the
keyboard.
The
section
begins
dynamically
low,
at
piano,
gradually
increasing
in
volume
as
the
keyboard’s
written
part
becomes
busier
in
tandem
with
the
drums.
For
the
end
of
the
section
the
B
section
melody
is
re-‐introduced
while
the
drums
continue
to
solo.
Everybody
ends
the
solo
with
an
Fmaj7#11
chord,
held
for
two
bars,
before
the
guitar
plays
the
phrase
from
the
introduction,
this
time
with
the
entire
band
catching
the
last
hit
of
the
motif.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
section
incorporating
the
drum
solo
and
end
of
the
piece.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
23
–
Dip
–
End
Section
3.3
–
Rehearsal
and
Adjustments
Rehearsal
of
this
piece
brought
about
a
dramatic
change
in
terms
of
the
instrumentation
as
the
original
line-‐up
was
to
include
cajón
and
tabla
rather
than
drum
set.
However,
upon
rehearing
the
piece
it
became
apparent
that
the
larger
orchestrational
palate
and
dynamic
capabilities
of
the
drum
set
would
be
more
beneficial
to
the
piece.
Also,
an
issue
that
I
hadn’t
considered
before
the
rehearsal
was
that
the
fact
that
the
tabla
is
a
pitched
instrument
created
an
issue
because
of
the
harmonic
density
of
the
piece.
The
fact
that
there
was
such
a
high
volume
of
chord
changes,
as
well
as
the
fact
none
of
these
chords
belonged
to
the
same
key
center
or
harmonic
universe,
meant
that
several
tabla
drums
would
have
to
be
set
up
to
keep
up
with
the
harmony.
This
was
problematic
because
it
meant
the
piece
was
quite
physically
uncomfortable
to
play
for
the
musician,
while
also
meaning
that
as
the
specific
drum
was
constantly
changing
to
accommodate
the
chords,
it
was
impossible
to
built
a
sense
of
continuity
within
the
tabla
part
itself.
The
constant
changing
of
the
pattern
and
tone
was
unfortunately
unavoidable,
quite
distracting,
and
not
in
keeping
with
what
was
intended
for
the
piece.
Also,
without
the
tabla,
the
cajón
did
not
have
the
ability
to
create
the
necessary
ethereal
atmosphere
required
for
the
B
Section
melody
and
interlude
between
solos.
After
listening
back
to
the
recording
it
was
quite
clear
that
a
drum
set
would
be
far
more
appropriate
to
the
piece.
3.
4
-‐
Collaborative
Advice
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
interlude
between
the
guitar
and
piano
solo
was
something
that
would
be
talked
about
later
in
the
paper.
The
reason
for
this
is
that
in
the
initial
writing
stages,
this
interlude
was
simply
a
repetition
of
the
B
Section
melody.
However,
upon
listening
to
the
rehearsal
recording,
Perico
suggested
that
perhaps
it
would
be
more
effective
to
compose
something
new
here
rather
than
just
repeat
previously
heard
material.
This
line
of
thought
is
very
much
in
keeping
with
what
I
usually
work
towards
in
a
composition
and
therefore
I
tended
to
agree
with
him.
The
intent
in
writing
this
section
was
to
create
something
new,
but
still
relevant
to
what
had
preceded
it.
To
achieve
this,
voicings
from
the
B
section
were
used,
but
with
a
different
harmonic
rhythm,
as
well
as
in
a
different
order.
The
process
for
choosing
what
chords,
and
what
order,
was
simply
done
through
trial
and
error,
mixing
and
matching
the
different
options
until
a
selection
was
found.
The
resulting
progression
was;
Melodically,
the
approach
was
similar
to
the
B
Section
of
the
piece,
using
a
repeated
rhythm
while
changing
the
melody
notes.
The
phrase
is
initially
played
by
the
keyboard
only,
before
being
joined
by
the
bass,
which
plays
the
same
figure.
In
the
case
the
rhythm
played
by
the
guitar
was
dictated
by
the
rhythm
of
the
melodic
figure,
the
chord
changing
to
match
the
melodic
note
on
the
second
eighth
note
of
beat
two.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
the
interlude
section.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
24
–
Dip
–
Interlude
3.5
–
Recording
The
recording
session
for
“Dip”
was
14.00-‐17.00,
on
the
9th
April
2014
at
the
Ann
Kreis
Scroing
Stage,
Berklee
Valencia.
The
engineer
for
the
session
was
Matthew
Mazzone,
and
the
band
consisted
of
Daniel
Toledo
on
electric
bass,
Ricardo
Curto
on
keyboards,
Mariano
Steimberg
on
drums,
as
well
as
myself
on
electric
guitar.
The
session
schedule
was
planned
to
be;
•
14.00-‐15.00
–
Setup.
•
15.00-‐16.30
–
Record
multiple
takes
of
piece.
•
16.30-‐17.00
–
Tear
down
equipment.
The
microphones
to
be
used
for
the
session
were
decided
in
advance
by
Matthew
and
I
and
consisted
of;
•
Guitar
–
SM57
+
Reyer
121
•
Bass
–
D.I.
•
Keyboards
–
D.I.
•
Drums
–
Kick
-‐
AKG
D112,
Snare
-‐
SM57,
Toms
-‐
Sennheiser
421
Overheads
–
KM
184
Due
to
time
constraints
and
the
decision
to
change
from
using
tabla
and
cajón
to
using
drumset,
the
recording
session
was
the
first
time
all
members
of
the
group
had
played
the
composition
together.
This
meant
that
the
first
couple
of
recorded
takes
of
the
piece
were
used
more
for
everyone
to
get
comfortable
with
their
parts
and
with
each.
This
situation
was
not
ideal
and
quite
stressful,
however,
the
playing
of
the
piece
came
together
quite
quickly
and
in
the
end
the
recording
was
deemed
a
success.
After
the
recording
session
on
the
Scoring
Stage,
I
decided
that
I
wanted
to
use
this
piece
as
an
opportunity
to
experiment
with
some
unusual
recording
techniques.
Studio
A
was
booked
for
a
recording
session,
and
in
this
session
several
guitar
takes
were
recorded
of
mostly
high
pitched
feedback
and
effect
pedal
laden,
non-‐diatonic
noise.
After
recording
all
these
different
sounds,
a
lot
of
time
was
spent
in
Pro
Tools,
cutting
different
segments
of
these
recordings
and
matching
them
together
to
create
atmospheric
sounds
to
complement
the
sparseness
of
the
B
Section
melody,
the
interlude,
to
add
to
the
tension
created
during
the
drum
solo,
and
also
the
very
last
note
of
the
piece.
This
technique
of
using
guitar
to
create
sounds
and
atmospheric
effects
not
usually
associated
with
the
instrument
is
an
influence
taken
very
much
from
the
music
of
Radiohead,
and
guitarist
Jeff
Beck.
Here
is
an
audio
sample
of
some
of
the
use
of
atmospheric
noise
in
the
track.
•
Soundcloud
Playlist
–
Track
25
–
Dip
–
Sound
Effects
3.6
–
Lessons
Learned
Making
a
conscious
decision
to
incorporate
information
from
my
private
lesson
to
a
composition
was
extremely
beneficial.
Deciding
to
use
melodic
minor
harmony
as
the
basis
for
the
main
melody
and
solo
section
meant
that
I
while
composing
and
practicing
the
piece,
I
was
also
preparing
myself
for
material
specific
to
my
lesson.
Aside
from
the
fact
that
this
had
the
benefit
of
aiding
the
progress
of
my
classwork,
it
also
meant
that
I
was
continually
challenging
myself
by
incorporating
what
was,
at
that
time,
unfamiliar
material
into
a
creation
that
was
my
own.
Thereby
increasing
the
sonic
range
of
what
usually
comes
naturally
to
me
as
a
composer.
Another
area
in
which
learning
was
achieved
during
this
process
was
in
the
field
of
recording
techniques.
As
the
session
for
overdubbing
the
guitar
effects
was
after
the
main
session
on
the
scoring
stage,
I
engineered
the
overdubs
myself.
This
put
me
in
the
position
of
having
complete
control
over
the
recording
techniques
employed,
and
forced
me
to
confront
some
areas
of
my
expertise
which
were
weak.
Increasing
skill
levels
in
this
area
will
be
extremely
advantageous
for
the
future
as
it
will
enable
me
to
both
record
myself,
and
also
increase
my
understanding
of
what
engineers
do,
with
the
additional
benefit
of
being
better
able
to
articulate
my
needs
in
recording
situations.
Connecting
the
Compositions
1.1–
Musical
Connections
While
writing
and
recording
the
above
pieces,
there
were
some
aspects
of
the
compositions
that
were
approached
similarly
during
each.
During
the
above
analysis
it
was
regularly
demonstrated
that
there
was
intent
to
never
repeat
the
same
material
in
exactly
the
same
way.
If
a
section
was
to
be
repeated,
methods
of
achieving
this
included;
changing
the
instrument
playing
the
melody,
adding
an
instrument
to
double
the
melody
or
repeated
part,
starting
the
repeated
part
from
somewhere
other
than
what
was
previously
the
beginning,
changing
the
role
of
an
instrument
from
melody
to
harmony
or
vice
versa.
The
intent
behind
this
was
to
keep
the
attention
of
the
listener
by
circumventing
their
expectations,
and
is
keeping
with
the
initial
aspiration
of
engaging
an
audience
with
influences
of
pop/rock/funk
music
in
mind.
Another
method
employed
in
the
construction
of
each
composition
was
the
reversal
of
the
solo
forms.
In
each
case,
no
instrument
solos
over
exactly
the
same
form,
it
was
always
a
reversal
of
the
structure
the
previous
instrument
had
used
to
solo
over.
This
was
as
a
result
of
always
including
a
written
section
between
the
solos,
usually
based
on
a
section
of
the
melody,
thereby
allowing
the
next
solo
form
to
begin
from
the
subsequent
section
of
the
melody
while
still
maintaining
aural
cohesion.
The
use
of
pentatonics
for
constructing
melodies
was
also
an
element
connecting
each
composition,
particularly
the
combination
of
minor
pentatonic
scales
played
beginning
from
the
major
7th
of
a
major
chord.
This
chord/scale
combination
results
in
the
inclusion
of
a
#11,
which
creates
an
open,
Lydian
sound
while
still
retaining
the
accessible
melodicism
of
a
minor
pentatonic
scale.
This
approach
for
creating
melodies
is
an
influence
directly
taken
from
the
music
of
Wayne
Shorter,
particularly
the
albums,
“Juju”,
and
“Speak
No
Evil”.
Another
method
that
was
employed
in
each
composition
was
the
use
of
a
top
note
connecting
a
series
of
quite
harmonically
complex
chords.
As
mentioned
previously
many
of
the
more
unusual
chord
structures
took
their
influence
from
the
music
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel.
The
use
of
slash
chords
with
unusual
tensions,
b9
played
on
major
chords
etc,
needed
to
be
offset
by
the
coherence
of
keeping
a
constant
element
throughout,
the
use
of
a
static
top
note
throughout
complex
harmonic
movement
was
extremely
effective
in
each
case
and
therefore
was
employed
each
time
this
situation
arose.
As
well
as
keeping
static
notes
on
top
of
moving
harmony,
another
technique
employed
in
each
composition
that
takes
it’s
influence
from
the
music
of
Kurt
Rosenwinkel,
is
the
use
of
chromatic
bass
movement.
This
is
an
excellent
technique
for
any
situation
where
the
creation
of
tension
is
required
and
was
used
extensively
in
each
composition.
Although
there
were
many
elements
that
were
consciously
chosen
as
compositional
techniques
prior
to
the
writing
of
each
piece,
there
were
also
some
that
were
not
previously
planned,
but
became
apparent
after
the
analysis.
One
very
obvious
example
of
this
was
the
fact
that
in
each
piece
the
A
section
provides
the
main
melodic
content,
while
the
B
section
melody
is
closer
to
an
ostinato
than
an
actual
melody
per
se.
This
is
demonstrable
in
all
three
of
the
pieces
analysed
here,
and
while
it
was
not
a
technique
that
had
been
consciously
adapted,
it
was
extremely
effective
in
each
piece
and
something
that
will
certainly
be
consciously
explored,
put
into
use,
and
adapted
for
future
compositions.
A
non-‐compositional
element
that
connects
each
of
these
pieces
is
the
sound
of
the
electric
guitar.
This
is
something
that
was
consciously
worked
on
and
tweaked
before
each
recording.
The
equipment
used
to
achieve
the
sound
for
the
chordal,
or
non-‐lead,
parts
is
an
MXR
Distrtion+
pedal,
combined
with
a
Boss
DD6
Digital
delay.
The
lead
sound
again
used
the
Boss
DD6,
this
time
combined
with
a
RAT
distortion
and
occasionally
a
Digitech
Whammy
pedal.
A
Fender
Hot
Rod
Deluxe
was
the
amplifier
used
in
each
case.
While
not
a
compositional
element
itself,
the
guitar
sound
is
almost
the
most
important
aspect
of
their
connection.
The
sound
of
the
instrument
is
the
voice
of
the
composer
and
should
be
recognisable
and
distinctive
throughout.
2.1
–
Aspirations
achieved?
As
mentioned
at
the
beginning
of
the
text,
there
were
a
number
of
aspirations
for
these
compositions
prior
to
actually
writing
them,
including
creating
a
listenability
and
melodic
accessibility
in
keeping
with
influences
from
the
pop/rock/funk
world,
while
still
incorporating
the
improvisational
elements
of
jazz
music.
As
the
composer
and
performer
of
these
pieces
it
is
difficult
to
be
objective
in
judging
whether
or
not
these
aspirations
were
achieved.
However,
after
repeated
listening
it
does
seem
that
each
track
has
enough
elements
associated
with
other
forms
of
music
to
hold
the
attention
of
listeners
that
are
not
fans
of
jazz.
These
elements
include
many
of
the
compositional
approaches
previously
spoken
of,
as
well
as
an
overall
sound
that
has
more
in
common
with
rock
music
than
jazz.
One
aspect
of
the
pieces
that
may
not
fit
with
the
intended
aesthetic
is
the
length
of
the
compositions
themselves.
The
shortest
track
is
just
under
five
minutes,
the
longest
is
closer
to
eight.
While
this
is
not
in
keeping
with
the
influence
of
contemporary
popular
music,
it
may
not
necessarily
be
considered
a
negative
outcome.
It
seems
that
while
it
is
important
to
consider
the
listener
in
these
cases,
it
is
also
important
to
allow
the
musicians
time
and
opportunity
to
express
themselves
during
solos.
Also,
an
awareness
of
keeping
the
potential
reach
of
the
piece
as
strong
as
possible
should
not
be
executed
at
the
expense
of
the
musical
quality.
While
all
the
elements
stated
in
this
paper
were
considered
while
writing
each
piece,
the
deciding
factor
was
always
the
musical
quality.
If
a
section
seemed
like
it
needed
to
be
long,
or
if
unusual,
dissonant
harmony
was
the
most
effective
option,
this
was
the
option
that
was
chosen.
Whether
or
not
this
approach
was
the
correct
one
will
become
more
apparent
once
the
EP
is
released,
and
direct
feedback
can
be
received
from
listeners
and
colleagues.
Final
Conclusions
1.1
–
Lessons
Learned
During
the
process
of
writing
and
recording
these
pieces
my
knowledge
increased
in
numerous
areas,
all
of
which
have
been
previously
discussed
in
the
conclusion
of
each
chapter.
The
areas
in
which
I
have
learned
extensively
included;
chord/scale
relationships,
different
approaches
to
beginning
a
composition,
recording
techniques,
time
management
with
regards
the
writing
and
arrangement
of
charts,
etc.
However,
the
most
valuable
lesson
I
gained
from
this
experience
was
the
realisation
of
how
important
writing,
composing,
and
performing
my
own
work
is
to
me.
Having
previously
spent
many
years
working
as
a
sideman,
as
well
as
working
as
a
collaborative
writer
in
band
situations,
it
had
been
several
years
since
I
had
the
time
to
work
on
material
that
was
entirely
self-‐composed.
The
realisation
of
how
much
I
enjoy
the
process
and
satisfaction
of
this
work
has
been
a
revelation,
and
means
I
will
ensure
to
prioritise
this
in
the
future.
As
mentioned
earlier
in
this
document,
the
ability
to
combine
a
working
life
that
incorporates
both
the
playing
of
other
people’s
material
as
well
as
my
own
will
ensure
that
I
stay
challenged
and
engaged
as
a
professional
musician.
Also,
time
spent
working
on
my
own
compositions
is
invaluable
to
the
expedient
growth
of
my
own
voice
as
an
instrumentalist.
While
this
is
enormously
beneficial
to
me
in
terms
of
nurturing
my
growth
as
a
composer,
it
also
has
the
added
benefit
of
making
my
approach
to
the
composed
music
of
others
more
recognisably
my
own,
which
may
make
it
easier
to
find
work
as
a
sideman
if
potential
employers
wish
to
have
this
particular
sound
on
their
recorded
work.
Another
element
that
changed
as
a
result
of
working
on
these
pieces
was
the
realisation
of
how
important
it
is
to
incorporate
as
many
disciplines
as
possible
into
your
practice
routine.
This
came
about
mostly
because
of
using
elements
from
my
private
lesson
in
the
compositions,
which
made
me
realise
the
time-‐saving
and
accelerated
learning
benefits
of
this
technique.
Doing
this
meant
that
I
was
incorporating
sounds
that
were
new
to
me
into
my
compositions,
as
well
as
working
on
soloing
over
this
new
material,
all
while
working
on
getting
a
composition
written.
I
noticed
the
speed
at
which
I
became
familiar
with
new
material
greatly
increased
when
I
used
it
in
a
composition
rather
than
just
practicing
separately
from
the
writing
process,
and
this
is
definitely
a
new
aspect
to
my
practicing
technique
that
I
will
continue
to
employ
in
the
future.
1.2
–
Planning
Ahead
The
next
step
for
my
original
music
is
to
make
it
available
to
the
public.
As
I
have
signed
as
an
artist
to
Disrupción
Records,
the
Berklee
Valencia
record
label,
this
means
I
will
have
substantial
help
with
this
process.
The
plan
is
to
have
a
digital
release
of
the
EP
on
many
platforms
in
summer
2014,
the
label
will
help
in
terms
of
marketing,
promotion,
artwork,
etc.,
and
discussions
and
meetings
regarding
this
process
are
ongoing.
Upon
completing
the
Contemporary
Performance
program
at
Berklee
Valencia,
I
will
be
embarking
on
a
tour
of
the
west
coast
of
the
United
States,
followed
by
other
short
tours
in
Scotland,
Ireland,
Italy,
and
Spain,
this
time
working
as
a
sideman.
Following
the
completion
of
these
travels
I
will
be
scheduling
a
physical
release
of
an
album
version
of
the
EP
in
November
2014,
in
Dublin,
Ireland.
Following
the
physical
release
of
this
album,
booking
agents
for
festivals
in
every
possible
area
of
the
globe
will
be
approached
with
a
view
to
securing
dates
for
summer
2015.
During
this
time
I
will
be
working
as
a
sideman
in
various
projects
mostly
based
in
Ireland,
while
also
beginning
work
on
composing
for
the
follow
up
to
the
EP.
Link
to
free
download
of
EP;
•
http://stephenmchale.bandcamp.com/releases
Media of